BRT Moving Slower than Molasses
Posted by Glenn on April 19, 2006 - 12:31pm in The Oil Drum: Local
First to present their side were a collection of folks from the MTA, city DOT and state DOT. The first disappointment to most of the people in attendence was that despite the broad-based community support for faster, more efficient and higher quality bus services all that is being discussed by city/state/MTA officials is a STUDY that will examine 15 routes to pick JUST 5 in June 2007 and then (assuming the planets are aligned) to implement by late 2008.
They have been dragging this study out for years. People are starting to get frustrated at the lack of progress and continuing uncertainty around the actual implementation. And you could almost understand the time to plan this out if their plan was even semi-ambitious, but alas it's about as minimal as BRT can get and even still honestly call it "BRT".
And it would only have one dedicated bus lane on the right side of the street. As far as I could see, their plan mostly relied on signage and markings on the street to define the bus lane which is really no better than we currently have and probably unenforcable. Much of the rest of their presentation focused on how important it is to market and brand the BRT system, which is great and all, as long as it doesn't take one more day to implement. In the Q&A, they said the delay had to do with collecting a massive amount of data on parking patterns, which seems to suggest that they seem overly concerned about the dozens of people in cars illegally parking in the bus lane during rush hour over the tens of thousands that take buses on the M15.
Then Paul Steely White from Transportation Alterntives and Bruce Schaller each gave presentations which looked at international examples of good BRT that mostly have two physically separated bus lanes - one for local stops, one for express stops.
Frankly, it's time for some of the planning to be tested in the real world. It's time for a BRT pilot or two within 6 months and then a planned expansion to all 15 lines within a few year. This would give many underserved areas of the city that mostly rely on cars access to higher quality mass transit and connections to key transportation hubs. This would put into place a more efficient infrastructure as energy prices continue to increase.
Not knowing that, and having to leave after the guy from Transportation Alternatives spoke, I had a more positive reaction to the meeting, thinking "well, good, I'm glad something is going to be done about 2nd Ave transportation."
But I did get that the MTA planners were vastly underreaching, compared with what the Transportation Alternatives rep presented, and I felt that whatever was going to be done, it was likely to be a half-arsed effort.
It seems the norm in America, and New York especially, to take great ideas, even ones that have been implemented elsewhere, and then to sort of plan to fail, being overly cautious and only partially implementing important features. Inevitably people point to these efforts as failures and the idea is never tried again anywhere. In the meantime, the public has to suffer through a bad system that was designed to fail.
The MTA et al. seems to be heading this way with BRT.
In a city where so many rely on cars, there certainly does need to be an effort, when implementing the system, to market it properly so the public knows they can leave their cars at home and safely get to work in time. But traffic can't get that much worse with the loss of 1-2 lanes - busses already clog up these lanes anyway. A properly implemented full BRT system could only improve traffic...
And now I'm rambling. Anyway, I was glad to be able to go to the forum, and glad to hear your take on it.
The alternative, as you mention, is to try to use the force of marketing to put a sheen on normal bus service and sort of wish it into being seen as BRT. I certainly do hope that isn't what ends up happening here in NYC.