Urban Renewal for the 21st Century
Posted by Glenn on March 9, 2006 - 3:15pm in The Oil Drum: Local
None of these ideas are new, indeed many point out that this is just going back to the pre-1920s organic urban development that was in place before the automobile obsession of the last 85 years. Cities did pretty much as much they could to open themselves up to the automobile, but issues of traffic congestion, pollution, pedestrian/cyclist deaths and noise/honking have persisted and worsened over time. The tide is now shifting against the automobile in the urban environment. Not because drivers are finally willing to sacrifice their automobile for the public good, but because the public is finally realizing that they have been sacrificing their lives and the quality of their lives for an illusory economic benefit.
A new report released in February at the Urban Center (Madison and 51st Street) gives hard data to support this shift. It showed that passenger automobiles serve little to no economic function in the Manhattan Central Business District (Manhattan CBD = South of 60th Street). Key Findings below:
2. Cars Provide Little to No Economic Benefit to the CBD: Only 14% of shopping trips to the CBD are taken by car compared with 72% by foot, mass transit or both. About 60% of trips by car into the CBD from the East River Bridges are merely to go through it. In fact many avoid going through Staten Island because of the high Verrazano Bridge toll ($9), versus the free East River Bridges.
3. Car Commuters Have other Options: 90% of auto-commuters have a mass transit option, but drive because it is faster, more comfortable and/or they have free parking at work. When travel time is the same, but have to pay for parking people take mass transit. When the travel time is the same but people have free parking, they drive for convenience. Government employees have some of the highest car-commuting rates (33% vs. 10-13% of CBD commuters) in the city because they have free parking permits.
Tomorrow I will post some ideas on how to start using this data to inform policy decisions - Any ideas from our readers?