DrumBeat: October 24, 2006
Posted by threadbot on October 24, 2006 - 9:18am
Greed will trigger 'ecosystem collapse'
A large-scale ecosystem collapse within 50 years is likely if current global consumption levels are not cut by half, an environmental group has warned...."We are in serious ecological overshoot, consuming resources faster than the earth can replace them. The consequences of this are predictable and dire."
Thousands without gas after Pakistan pipeline blast
QUETTA, Pakistan (AFP) - Suspected tribal rebels blew up a key pipeline in southwestern Pakistan's volatile Baluchistan province, leaving tens of thousands of people without gas, officials said.The pre-dawn blast suspended natural gas supplies to the provincial capital Quetta, as well as the Kalat, Mastung, Ziarat and Pishin districts, a gas company official said on condition of anonymity on Tuesday.
Philippine workers evacuated after riot in Kazakhstan
Hundreds of Filipino workers have been evacuated from an oil-drilling site in Kazakhstan after a riot that left dozens dead and injured, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs said.
Nigeria: Enugu Residents Protest Power Outage
WILD protests, weekend greeted introduction of new pre-paid meter pilot project of the Enugu Distribution zone of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) as residents accused officials of disrupting power supplier.
Uganda: Power Cuts Aggravate City Water Shortage
Russian energy roulette spooks Japanese
The imbroglio over the huge Sakhalin-2 oil-and-gas project in Russia's Far East involving two Japanese firms has cast a cloud over resource-poor Japan's new national energy strategy. It has also served as a fresh reminder that Japan's economic power seems to have lost much of its luster, at least in the eyes of the Russians.
Far away from Darfur's agony, Khartoum is booming
Small islands suffered the most from high oil prices
The rising oil prices have become an urgent issue for the South Pacific small islands and territories with relatively weak economy, said their leaders Monday in Nadi, Fiji.
BP says Q3 profits jump 58% on asset sales
Oil producer BP Plc's (BP.L) third-quarter replacement cost net profit rose 58 percent to $6.975 billion thanks to asset sales but still undershot analysts' forecasts as production and refining margins fell....The world's second-largest fully-quoted oil company by market capitalization also ditched its 2006 oil and gas production target, saying it would produce only 3.95 million barrels of oil equivalent (boepd) per day this year compared to an original target of 4.1-4.2 million boepd.
Italy's Eni makes new gas discovery in U.S. waters in the Gulf of Mexico
Oil Search warns on production
OIL output from Oil Search fell in the third quarter and the company has warned it will not meet its 2006 production forecasts.
OPEC's Cuts Signal Pricing Worries
Saudis: All Customers to See Less November Oil
Bush to OPEC: high oil prices may "wreck economies"
Russian Expert Addresses Europe's Security Concerns
Russia is playing an ever-larger role in global energy politics -- from Europe to Central Asia to Iran. Yelena Telegina, a member of the board of the Association of Russian Crude Oil Exporters and former board chairwoman of Rosneft, spoke with RFE/RL correspondents Claire Bigg and Breffni O'Rourke about these issues and more.
Oil patch's profit party is slowing down
Gas prices fall to lowest level in 2006
It is time to make a serious effort to save the vanishing wetlands and barrier islands along the coast of Louisiana. The best chance is a bill passed by the Senate that would guarantee Louisiana and three other coastal states a share of oil and gas revenues from drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. The states would be expected to use the proceeds largely for coastal restoration and related projects.
In Deregulation, Power Plants Turn Into Blue Chips
U.S., EU hold climate talks despite Kyoto rift
HELSINKI - The United States and the European Union met on Tuesday in Helsinki to seek ways to curb greenhouse gases and promote clean energies, setting aside years of disputes over the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol which caps emissions.
Climate change could lead to more failed states
Global warming is exacerbating disputes over access to water and food resources, and could lead to more failed states, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett warned in an interview published in the Financial Times.
Global forests disappearing for a pittance
Global warming caused by rapid deforestation could be curbed if developing countries were paid the proper rewards for maintaining their woodland, a World Bank study said.
U.K.: Biggest wind power project is blown off course as residents fight back
"I just happen to think wind is a bit of a white elephant because it's so inefficient and I cannot understand why anyone would choose one of the best bird sanctuaries in Europe as a site."
Ethanol: Blessing or Bane? Plants offer promise of prosperity, but some fear bubble may burst.
Nippon Oil, Toyota to develop biofuel
George Monbiot: Small is Useless: Micro generation can’t solve climate change.
Oil importers meet in Beijing demanding bigger say in price of oil
Top energy officials from major oil importers the United States, Japan, the Republic of Korea and India met in Beijing Monday with their Chinese counterparts to explore ideas about restraining and stabilizing crude oil prices."The five giant oil consumers are turning from competitors into cooperators," said Li Xiaogang with the Foreign Investment Research Institute of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences.
"If they could team up to balance OPEC, the world's crude oil market would fluctuate less," Lin Boqiang, director of the China Energy Research Institute at Xiamen University, told China Business on Monday.
A new acceleration additive for making 'ice that burns'
Japanese scientists are reporting discovery of an additive that can speed up the formation of methane hydrates. Those strange substances have sparked excitement about their potential as a new energy resource and a deep freeze to store greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide.
US sends the wrong messages to Iran
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HJ25Ak01.html
I am not going to the conference, however if anyone would like to meet up for drinks/dinner one evening (Thursday or Friday night?) to talk shop (Peak Oil), I'd be interested.
I know a good Irish Pub close by with decent food.
My email is in my profile.
Garth
I was wondering if the people at OilDrum might want to start compiling a list of links to candidates in the upcoming elections who are peak oil "aware" or who appear to have sensible energy and/or environmental policies. For example, I just became aware of a green party candidate for senate in Maryland (I'm from Maryland) who refers to peak oil in some statements on his website. Here is the site:
http://www.kevinzeese.com/content/view/17/33/
-Larry
My buddy got a visit from the Sheriff one time b/c of the similar leaves to marijuana to the uninformed.
As far as the oil supply is concerned, the world bubbles over with optimism.
During the day I usually keep the TV on CNBC. Listening, day after day, to the analysts and commentators, optimism absolutely abounds where the oil supply is concerned. No one believes the OPEC cuts will make one whit of difference. As the talking heads come and go, they all have the very same message: "There is plenty of supply out there." Don't worry, be happy, all is well in the oil patch.
I have heard not a single comment about what effect high prices are having on world consumption. No one mentions the fact that average oil production in 2006 averages about 119 million barrels per day below 2005 production for both crude + condensate as well as all liquids.
All this wild optimism leaves me puzzled. It seems to be like a meme, a contagious idea that has infected the mind of almost everyone in the investment world. And I keep wondering; how long before this meme leads them to disaster.
Ron Patterson
It should have read 119 thousand barrels per day below 2005 production.
Sorry for the brain lapse.
Ron Patterson
Seriously, I don't think this is so much of a meme as a good example of groupthink. But the infinite growth idea, now that is definitely a meme.
You really hit the nail on the head there Ron. This is irrational exuberance at its most extreme and it certainly is contagious. The level of complacency out there now is absolutely staggering, as that level of manic optimism makes people fearless - it makes them discount, or ignore entirely, the obvious risks they are facing. However, a consensus that extreme is ususally indicative of a trend reaching exhaustion. If everyone is bullish and has acted (ie placed their bets) accordingly, who is there left to buy into the upward trend in order to sustain it?
When the greatest speculative fool has already committed himself, then the trend will reverse, and will probably do so sharply. As the reversal picks up speed (as it will because fear is a much sharper emotion than hope or greed and therefore spreads much more quickly), the downturn will begin to feed on itself just as the upswing has done. IMO we are very close to the point of reversal, although the prevailing optimism makes such a forecast seem incredible at this point.
Two months before result announcements the CFO left, everyone thought he was stupid. It looked like he was not because the global situation started to decline afterwards.
Then two days before, an optimist CEO told us that everything was fine and he was still expecting a soon and substantial increase of share value.
The people at the office all believed him, even ten days later when the stock felt 50%, most of them were still believing, only when it felt to less than 1% after a very short period of time, people started to understand...
Hopefully I was working out of the office and somehow protected from the illness, so I sold my stock options before they valued nothing.
Eventhough, I was still a bit confused because I bought some share at 50 cents (from 80$ high) hoping to make a good deal! I lost everything of course.
This is a good sample of mental blindness caused by your environment. This time, everything from family, work, hobbies to MSM is causing this blindness, it will be very difficult to escape the crash.
Many thanks to TOD and others to help us.
I dunno, maybe there's worse.....not by much.
This plateau continues to impact those at the very lowest economic levels in ways not apparent. Who can blame Darfur or Iraq on declining discoveries? Who can blame global warming on this same pre-peak irrational exhuberance?
As the old firesign Theater used to say,
Don't panic, Don't take off your shoes !
At the end of each of these feeds they have a little "lighter side" type story that's supposed to get you all feelin' good before you encounter the rush hour hell...
Well today's funny story was about (paraphrasing) - Motor Trend's SUV of the year goes to Mercedes Benz GL450 - it may be a gas guzzler V-8 but it'll get you around in style blah blah blah with 335 horsies etc etc...
All that got out of me was nervous laughter - not quite the gee whiz chuckle and Neanderthal drooling of their target audience I suppose...
Oh by the way - if you're looking for one they're only about $55k
Ron Patterson
My subtle reference was to the 3 Strike Groups currently cruising around (wasting our tax dollars) the Persian Gulf.
US naval war games off the Iranian coastline: A provocation which could lead to War?
by Michel Chossudovsky
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20061024&articleId=3593
There is a massive concentration of US naval power in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Three US naval strike groups off the Iranian coastline are deployed: USS Enterprise, USS Eisenhower and USS Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group.
The naval strike groups have been assigned to fighting the "global war on terrorism."
Tehran considers the US war games to be conducted in the Persian Gulf, off the Iranian coastline as a provocation, which is intended to trigger a potential crisis and a situation of direct confrontation between US and Iranian naval forces in the Persian Gulf:
"Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.
Iran's official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed foreign ministry official as describing the military manoeuvres as dangerous and suspicious.
Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.
The Iranian foreign ministry official said the US-led exercises were not in line with the security and stability of the region. Instead, they are aimed at fomenting crises, he said." (quoted in BBC, 23 October 2006)
Also...this morning:
N. Korea threatens war if South joins sanctions
Pyongyang issued similar threat before this month's nuclear test
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15411541/
And now, the rest of the story. In 1984, I was finally able to vote, and was quite determined to vote for the Libertarian candidate, until I was informed that the Libertarian candidate was not on the ballot. I am not a Libertarian, but in the choice between Mr. Reagan or Mr. Mondale, anyone (which I still think) would be an improvement.
Further, I was informed at the polling place in Fairfax County that they would not accept any write-in vote on my part - which I found out later was actually not legal, as they were supposed to at least accept a write-in candidate, who then could be legally ignored by all parties concerned, except for counting it before throwing into the trash.
So I step into the voting booth, and there was actually a third candidate - Lyndon LaRouche, a true whackjob who I had watched around midnight weeks before, going from economics to nuclear war in something like 60 seconds - with another 29 minutes to go. I have a pretty high tolerance for lunacy, but LaRouche got the better of me, and after five minutes, I just turned the TV off.
So there I was, proud to be exercising my right to participate in a duty which is considered so important to citizenship in democracy (it was considered to be real important in places like the Soviet Union or the DDR, too). I voted for LaRouche, knowing full well at that point what a farce the entire thing was.
But like convicted felon Moon and his Moonie Times, LaRouche was part of the background weirdness of 1980s politics (I actually ended up years later living fairly near the Loudoun 'compound' which according to him was not his, though the Feds up with it after a pretty serious fraud case involving credit cards and political contributions, for which LaRouche spent time behind bars). Of course, Moon just kept increasing his weirdness over the years (a crowning ceremony in the Capitol - I think that was the end of the Republic, right?). Nice to see LaRouche still has a hallowed place in economics - he was always very proud of his academic credentials, I guess because Moon already claimed to be the son of god.
From your view over in the BundesRepublik, what do you think of the idea of 'Mandatory Voting' in the US? Even writing the words out, I hear the little cries of 'Dictator!' 'Noo!' 'You can't make me!' .. but what would we be 'making ourselves' do, but to participate in our own government?
Dunno, just thinking about the electoral system.. I like the intstant runoff idea.. makes a lot of sense, but doesn't probably match the 'WinnerTakeAll' King for 4yrs model that this horserace has been enthroned as in the US..
Bob
On every ballot, 'None of the above' is a valid choice, and if 'None of the above' wins the election, the office is left empty until the next election.
It has the charming virtue of forcing people to realize how much or how little elected officials matter, and it makes an end run around the whole third party issue, which is one thing both Democrats and Republicans feel they can trust each other to work together on to prevent.
And it adds real teeth to the idea of voting 'them' out of office.
In my fuzzy memory, 'None of the above' is a valid choice in Nevada.
Stay tuned for how this turns out on Nov. 7th.
Seriously, I am not sure that pushing people to vote is a good idea. If they don't care enough to get off their duffs and vote on their own, they probably don't care enough to learn about the candidates and the issues, either. As it is, the first person on the ballot has a big advantage, because a lot of voters just vote for the first name they see. Then there are the people who win because they have "famous" names, like John Adams.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should...
Is he popular over there or something? Someone outside the train station in Koln stopped me and got me to donate for some of his literature.
He seems to write well, and seems to have his facts behind him and has been writing about the decline of the American 'empire' for much longer than I've known about it... but he seems to just be too much of a kook for anyone else, and I guess for me also.
I also am not aware of any of his history, besides his running for president at one time (I'm 28)
Wikipeida link
more than you ever wanted to know about LaRouche.
If they get any more annoying I might just do so.
Surrounded by people with expensive tracking transmitters on their hips... I feel so... help me find the right word...
http://www.webmd.com/content/article/128/117226
Who knew Gilligan's Island would be a preview of times to come. I have no cell phone, no iPod, and for many years I got by with WebTV instead of a real computer.
Gilligan's island, with six billion castaways. O:
Natural selection at work
I have a one hour a month contract, and rarely use it all.
Oh, I can see where this is going. A year from now, I'll be paging through the latest National Geo and I'll see an ad for Zygofil, accompanied by a picture of a handsome couple holding hands and walking along the beach: "Because he's a very important person, my stud-muffin is on his cell all day long. Since taking Zygofil, his payload-quality has increased by 30%...blah, blah, blah."
If you spend more than two hours a day on your cell-phone, see your doctor...
One little graph that grabbed me : in the lower left hand corner of page 6 of the PDF (Fig. 7: TEMPERATE AND TROPICAL TERRESTRIAL LIVING PLANET INDICES, 1970-2003)
The "living planet index" of temperate zones (i.e. the rich countries) has improved slightly since 1970 (now at about 1.05)
That of tropical zones has plunged disastrously, now at less than 0.5.
We have largely (in aggregate) stopped messing up our own back yard. Now we're mining the ecosystems of the third world to ensure our continued prosperity.
This is so simple of a concept I am having trouble believing ignorance of such scale issues is an simple oversight.
I have an absoutely beautiful and pristine view of the mountains from my house. No one has yet proposed putting wind towers on our ridges around here but if they did I could hardly oppose them when I consider the alternative of more coal fired plants.
And what's the view like of those destroyed mountains and valley and streams in West Virginia.
Marco.
Close...
Utility transmission and distribution lines, the backbone of our electrical power system, are responsible for 130 to 174 million bird deaths a year in the U.S.1
Collisions with automobiles and trucks result in the deaths of between 60 and 80 million birds annually in the U.S.3
While there are no required ongoing studies of bird mortality due to buildings or house windows, the best estimates put the toll due collisions with these structures at between 100 million and a staggering 1 billion deaths annually.4
Current mortality estimates due to telecommunication towers are 40 to 50 million birds per year.9
Agricultural pesticides are "conservatively estimated" to directly kill 67 million birds per year.10 These
rural free-ranging domestic cats in Wisconsin may be killing between 8 and 217 million birds each year. The most reasonable estimates indicate that 39 million birds are killed in the state each year."11
There are other studies on the impacts of jet engines, smoke stacks, bridges, and any number of other human structures and activities that threaten birds on a daily basis. Together, human infrastructure and industrial activities are responsible for one to four million bird deaths per day!
But what about wind turbines?
The NWCC reports that: "Based on current estimates, windplant related avian collision fatalities probably represent from 0.01% to 0.02% (i.e., 1 out of every 5,000 to 10,000) of the annual avian collision fatalities in the United States."15 That is, commercial wind turbines cause the direct deaths of only 0.01% to 0.02% of all of the birds killed by collisions with man-made structures and activities in the U.S.
http://www.awea.org/faq/sagrillo/swbirds.html
Looking at the broader context, if we enter PO and Jet travel, and car travel are reduced significantly, the increase in bird deaths from Wind Turbines would still leave us with a net reduction in bird deaths per year.
As for birds hitting windows on buildings, I do have to say while sad, it is somewhat amusing from a morbid point of view to watch this occur. One day at the office there was a hawk chasing a smaller bird of some type. The smaller bird dived to avoid the hawk, and the hawk followed. The small bird smacked right into the side of the window with a loud thud, and the hawk smacked right behind it. It was probably the closest realistic representation of a looney toons style chase I've ever seen.
Neither bird survived however. :-(
Again a year-to-year decrease for Vehicle Miles Travelled this month -- the fifth straight month there has been a decrease -- something that has not happened since 1979! Only Jan and March have been increases over the corresponding months in 2005.
From Jan 1981 through Dec 2004 there have been only 14 months of decreases in Vehicle Miles Travelled (and none from March 1982 through Dec 1990 -- I guess the "easy motoring 80s"). Now for 2005 there have been 7 negative months and 2006 (through Aug) 6 negative months.
I realize these are small decreases so far and probably represent "discretionary" driving. But I do want to look at these figures some more (as well as re-read the discussion here last fall on VMT) and try to see how much VMT is correlated to actual gas prices, GDP, etc.
"A Utility Deal With a Few Big Winners. - Four big investment firms bought a group of Texas power plants in 2004 for $900 million and sold them the next year for $5.8 billion."
Lots of profit taking by allowing power plants to be sold at often greatly undervalued prices and moved into unregulated subsidiaries and then shuffled back into the regulated arena to regain profitability with consumers eating any losses.
If the analysis of Ruppert and FTW is correct on the consequences of deregulation and the repeal of the Depression-era Public Utility Holding Company Act last year, then we all better brace ourselves because the combination of greed, concentration of ownership, a decrepit grid system and increasing scarcity will leave many users out in the cold - literally.
Thanks to Leanan for the link to this important article that so clearly explains the power plant shell game being played on unsuspecting utility customers. What a rip-off! I felt like someone was rifling through my pockets as I was read the article. As my father used to say, "they get you coming and going".
Hoowah! Monbiot's got me steaming, slaughtering my sacred cow like that! Actually the cow's fine, just a little bruised and embarrassed, and George will notice something smelly under his boot later on..
He rests on that common chestnut of "Wind can't possibly supply ALL our power.." "SOLAR could never replace ALL our power" .. and then coming out with those erudite dismissals like 'Staggeringly expensive'.. the boob..
Reading about the Pakistani Gas Line disruptions had me considering what a terrorist strike on the US Grid would do to us, how hard would it be to do it, how hard to recover from it? This is one of the reasons I'm glad I own a few panels already, and am working towards having some access to heat and electric in case the supply lines were all of the sudden cut off. (And hence, my disappointment at Monbiot's dismissal of self-generation. During a blackout, even a few watts could be precious and even lifesaving.. keeping radios, phones, some lights charged.. but if it all comes from "Massive Offshore Installations".. not much to do but sit and wait for help.. pretty lame)
I know I shouldn't be giving 'them' any ideas about how to hurt us.. I mean attacking the grid is almost as unthinkable as 9/11 was, (only it wasn't, eh?) So I'm sure there's already a blueprint for that scenario on their laptop.. is there a reaction plan on any of ours?
Bob Fiske
http://www.windside.com/
Bob
In your face, Monbiot!
( so saith the Mfr, in any case..)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Why The Windside Wind Turbines are the best on the market?
Quite simply Windside Wind Turbines work when others don't ! In the gentlest of summer breezes and in violent winter storms. When others fail due to frost, ice, snow or high winds Windside Wind Turbines continue to produce. Windside Wind Turbines will produce at least 50 % more electricity in a year than traditional propeller models. Many things make the Windside Wind Turbines extraordinary and their total life cost make them the best value for money.
Long-lasting
Windside Wind Turbines are constructed of high quality durable materials to ensure free production of electricity for many years even in the harshest of environments. Their design ensures a minimum requirement for maintenance. When other turbines have failed Windside Wind Turbines continue to produce. A Windside Wind Turbine will probably still be working long after the purchaser.
On Nature's Terms
Windside Wind Turbines are soundless. (0 db) They do not kill birds or people. For these reasons they are safe to use in population centres, public spaces, parks, wildlife parks and on buildigs. They are also beautiful and in many cases have been used to combine art and functionality.
Unless they are dirt cheap, I don't understand the point.
I did see a 5kW model but no details.
They do look really cool.
There are some articles in Motherearth News with 'Bifurcated Oil Drums' as vertical-axis mills. If they can be cheaply built, and have a low-tension design, then you can go parallel, and use a bunch of them.. More eggs in your basket.
Bob
http://www.otherpower.com/
and
http://www.fieldlines.com/
are doing. All DIY. On the fieldlines forum, you can ask any question about DIY energy and get some very knowledgeable answers.
Explore their sites and try it.
1- Low Wattage. Slow and steady wins the race.. especially if they are durable/repairable.. long lifespan means real payback and energy security. Be ready to get used to less.
2- 'Better be Dirt Cheap' - The modern consumer's mantra. Good luck with that. I don't expect anything to be dirt cheap, especially in the times to come. If you're looking to make a long-term quality investment.. why is that even a demand?
-- That's all impingent on this product being as good as they say. I don't know if this is the 'Turtle' in the race, just an unsung hero.. or a promise that can't deliver..
m/s WS-0,15 WS-0,30C WS-2 WS-4 WS-30 WS-75
3 1 2 10 20 150 375
4 2 4 20 40 300 750
5 3 7 35 70 527 1312
6 5 10 50 100 750 1875
7 7 15 75 150 1125 2812
8 10 21 105 210 1575 3937
9 15 30 150 300 2250 5625
10 20 40 200 400 3000 7500
Now that I am done fixing the spacing, I realize that using HTML tags would have been much easier. Oh well.
I'm not seeing this touted ability to work well with low wind speeds. These numbers look very similar to the numbers for similar horizontal axis turbines.
If these are cheap, they would be completely awesome because they could be easily mounted as an array on a single tower; that would produce some respectable power.
If you want to run just a few (CFL) lights in the evenings and a (small) fridge you need an average power of about 100 watts, so the very small models would not be of much utility.
As currently referenced in Energy Bulletin, and noted here before, Jared Diamond seems to be taking it on the chin for his arguments that Easter Island suffered an ecological collapse. Even USA Today has mentioned the debate:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2005-12-05-easter-island_x.htm
Barry Peise has links to several articles and a PDF of his own article:
http://www.staff.livjm.ac.uk/spsbpeis/CCNet-10-03-06.htm
There seem to be two main challenges, first that the island was settled much later than Diamond's source claimed, and second that the oral traditions of the Rapa Nui are unreliable if not outright invented by Europeans. Furthermore, Barry Peise claims that Diamond's work shows confirmation bias.
I wonder if Diamond is being attacked for being wrong, for being successful, or for being opinionated. In A Short History of Progress, although Ronald Wright spends more time on the damage caused by rats eating palm seeds and saplings, he otherwise tells almost the same story as Collapse. Diamond's much more popular books seem to have drawn all the attacks.
I haven't heard of any response from Diamond, or Wright, as yet.
I think he is getting attacked because he is presenting people with yet another 'inconveinent' truth.
How often do we see the veracity of a man's big-picture theory being attacked by someone finding a nit-pick flaw in it and then implying that the whole thing is wrong because one tiny part may have a defect?
Easter Island is the poster child of Collapse because it is easy to understand --because it has a pictorial icon associated with it, the statues.
A Nevada developer wants to take massive amounts of arid NW Arizona's groundwater, and to hopefully sweeten the deal, wants to pump some arsenic tainted water back into the Arizona acquifer. From this AzCentral link.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
To get a solid glimpse of our postPeak global future: may I suggest Haiti?
--------------------
With an area comparable to the state of Maryland and a population (at about 8.5 million) roughly the size of New York City's, Haiti is closer to Florida--just an hour and a half from Miami by jet--than is Washington, D.C. But in a very real sense, the distance between the United States and Haiti is almost unimaginable.
Clinging to Life
By the yardstick of income, Haiti is by far the poorest spot in the Western Hemisphere, and in fact one of the poorest places on the planet. State Department and CIA guesses put the country's per-capita income at about $550 a year, or about a dollar and a half per day--but these formal, exchange-rate based estimates are highly misleading, if not meaningless. (Could anyone in the United States today survive for a year consuming no more than $1.50 worth of goods and services a day?) A better sense of Haiti's plight comes from comparisons of purchasing power. Perhaps the most authoritative global estimates of this sort have been done by eminent economic historian Angus Maddison. At the start of this decade, according to Maddison, Haiti's per-capita output was thirty-five times lower than that of the United States. To get a sense of what this means, think how things would go for your family if you had to get by for the entire year on just ten days of your current earnings [bolding by Bob S. for emphasis --ELP anyone?]
Haiti looks impoverished even when compared to other impoverished countries. By Maddison's reckoning, per-capita purchasing power in Haiti is one-third that of Bolivia, the poorest country in South America. There is no country in the Middle East or Asia with an income level as low as Haiti's--not even Bangladesh. And although sub-Saharan Africa is the epicenter of desperate poverty in the modern world, a majority of sub-Saharan countries enjoy per-capita income levels that are higher than Haiti's.
-------------------------
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Thxs for the link and info. Yep, the race is on between Entropy and Overshoot; the full panorama of Jay Hanson's Thermo-Gene Collision. Will the millions in the American Southwest respond to global warming and drought by wise planning and pop. control, or will they prefer to migrate north causing rapid decimation of Cascadia? If a nomadic african tribesman cannot make it, what chance does a SUV owner, with a big screen tv, and huge mortgage payments have at Powerdown and a biosolar lifestyle?
Most Americans would rather bury their heads in sports and other pointless entertainment than take a good look around. When blackouts become the norm, and water and food is unaffordable to most--will we be happy campers, or warring tribes? Will most of NYC migrate to the Niagra Falls area to use the reliable hydro-electricity, or will they be content to walk everywhere and climb stairs? How many wealthy people, who refused to plan ahead like Richard Rainwater, will now be screaming, "My kingdom for a horse to pull a plow"? Will the Bush family be relaxing on their ranch in Paraguay as North America implodes from energy shortages causing shortages of everything else?
The concrete mixers and asphalt trucks continue to celebrate the DOW reaching 12,000 by motoring in a never-ending parade to help further expand the Asphalt Wonderland. The rush-hour blood-clots of humanity just stupidly sit waiting on the clogged arterials for the inevitable stroke of decline or the heart-attack of doom.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
Yes, spot on, all of that.
I also saw a short bit yesterday on something closer to home: the rapid desertification of the Canadian Prairies. Yes, that would be where all that food comes from.
Nice paradox: the lack of water forces the farmers to use more water to prevent their land from turning to desert. They'll try a few years, and then move out. There never was much water there originally, it's all delivered in canals and ditches, hundreds, thousands of miles of them.
And just now the TV news is blaring, first, about the wheat shortages, the main media have gotten wind, Australia harvest down 70%, and second, increased life expectation, people born today can expect to live to a much older age.
And they fail to make the connection between the two.......
Or, for that matter, between these two reports and the Prairies. Maybe it's connecting dots that's hardest. Maybe they really don't get it.
I really shouldn't watch television ...
First a big dieoff. Maybe a lot of suicides like in the Horn of Africa. Lots of killoffs as well by thieves and ner do wells.
Then something suprising happens. Animal life and vegetation start to flourish greatly. Without the road kill and hunting by homosapiens many species will flourish and within one generation will create a far larger population.
First becuase they have plenty to feed on. Dead human bodies.
Pollution will take awhile to disspate but the discharge of automobiles and vehicles in general will allow vegetation to start to slowly thrive. Wild mushrooms and other flora will once more grow abundately. The falling rain will not be full of acid and particulate matter. You need to learn how to capture it and use it wisely.
Foraging and hunting will be easy due to the species proliferating.The humans that survive will learn to live with nature and not wantonly destroy it. They will have plenty of clothing , from the deads houses. If they are wise they will find all the canned goods they can and store them where they will not freeze during the winter. This alone will allow them to transistion back to a future of more of a sustainable lifestyle. They can raid the garden supply stories like WalMart and others for seed stock. Hand tools will likewise be readily available, once the thugs die off. You can just hike in and pick up what you need.
Land will be basically free. You will be able to pick whatever you want. Tearing down houses will yield kindling wood until you collect enough axes and saws to start your woodpile.
Looking at it this way then those who survive the dieoff and killoff will not have it too difficult. Bikes all over the place to ride. All the clothing. Canned foods.
So the scenario should be.
Its the Boy Scouts all over again. Just how many saved their old BSA handbooks? Not many I am sure. I have mine as well as the Explorer handbook and two genuine BSA compasses. All the rest of my gear is mostly US Army issue. My bdus,canteens , web gear ,bushmaster .223, etc.
Aquarists who keep planted tanks have long known that injecting CO2 is beneficial, even necessary. Terrestrial plants can just grab CO2 from the air, but this is not possible for submersed plants. They have to take carbon from the water.
I keep a planted tank myself, and I have a pressurized CO2 cylinder (the kind used by restaurants for carbonated beverages) hooked up to it, for the plants.
In principle and in theory, I like the idea of algae as a biomass-to-fuel scheme.
However, I think there are some very stubborn facts that keep intruding upon the optimistic projections such a possibility.
Algae is a generic term for a whole group of plant-like micro- and macro-organisms that are photosynthetic and grow in water. While on the basis of photosynthetic conversion per unit of surface area exposed to sunlight, algae appears to be very efficient, when you get right down to what you have to do to harvest and extract biomass fuel from algae, then it does not look so attractive.
First of all, an open pond of a given area costs a lot more than a piece of farmland of the same area. And then if the pond needs to be covered, the cost goes up several-fold. Area exposed to sunlight is not the proper basis of evaluation.
Algae is very wet,sticky, and buoyant, and also tends to entrain gas bubbles. As such, havesting the algae on a large scale poses some very serious material handling challenges.
Then we have the requirement of extracting the lipids from the cellular mass. This can be done in several different ways, none of which appear to be either easy or cheap.
So, when you get right down to it, fuel from algae may look good from the standpoint of photosynthetic conversion per unit area, but the effort (and money) needed to get usuable fuel from the final product is not insignificant and may very well be worse than that of 'dry' land crops.
This problem is inherent whenever you have to handle large quantities of very wet and slimey material.
As much as I like the idea in theory, I find it very hard to be bullish on fuel from algae. I would love to see some hard data from full-scale demo projects that prove me wrong.
Easter Island foreclosing on a viable future by building stone statues was bad enough. Haiti as Easter Island so close to Florida will be a modern day example for us to study.
Another island nation, Madagascar, is culturally focused on it's past, instead of wisely planning for its future. This link states that due to global warming 99% of it's coral reefs are dying. But digging up the dead for parades and parties seems to be widely practiced
instead of a thoughtful plan for the future:
Excerpts:
----------------------------------------------
Madagascar, an island nation half again the size of California, has long had an uneasy relationship with Christianity. During the 19th century, Queen Ranavalona I suspected that missionaries were colonial agents, so she ordered her soldiers to push Christian converts off a cliff, which they did.
Today, 52% of Malagasy practice indigenous religions, while 41% are Christians, according to the CIA World Factbook. The reality, however, is far more complicated. Many families include both Christians and animists. And many individuals blend Christianity with a belief that the ancestors can intercede with the Creator to bless the living with wealth, health and happiness or, if mistreated, curse them with unemployment, disease and misery.
The melting pot often comes to a boil over the turning of the dead, or famadihana, as the ceremony is called in Malagasy. Although the Malagasy are an ethnic blend of Malaysians, Indonesians, Africans and Arabs, the origin of the famadihana itself is a mystery. Elie Rajaonarison, an anthropologist at the University of Antananarivo, says that the ceremony survives in part because it reinforces social order. People lead good lives so that they, too, will be honored as ancestors some day.
Generally, the exhumations are held in the dry season every five or seven years, after a family member has a dream in which a dead relative complains that he is cold in the tomb.
Exhumation ceremonies can be very expensive in a country where the average person earns roughly $900 a year. The new shrouds range from about $3.50 for a synthetic fabric to $110 for a fine shroud of light-brown raw silk. Buying a cheap one raises the specter of offending the ancestors, and the living.
Unlike Mr. Rabeatoandro's divided family, Georges Rakotomalala and his siblings agreed on the need to rewrap the ancestors entombed in Sahomby, a village of perhaps 100 residents overlooking rice paddies and eucalyptus groves 40 miles from Antananarivo. The problem was money. It took Mr. Rakotomalala, a 52-year-old butcher, 18 years to raise enough money to be able to exhume his ancestors in style.
----------------------
Just imagine if he had spent that money on solar panels, or a well. As their ecosystem collapses and 'curses' them with unemployment, disease and misery--expect a deluded cultural frenzy of parading the dead until even the living won't have the strength to dig their own graves.
Bob Shaw in Phx,Az Are Humans Smarter than Yeast?
WTI CRUDE FUTURE ($/barrel) 59.440
Just thought I'd thank you for continuing to post the environmental stories/links at the head of Drumbeat even tho they seldom get replies.
Today a little different. Theme picked up if not direct replies.
Peak oil is so linked to environment.
Thank you.