DrumBeat: October 20, 2006
Posted by threadbot on October 20, 2006 - 9:18am
OPEC cuts output by more than expected
Reduction of 1.2 million barrels a day is first in more than two yearsDOHA, Qatar - Oil cartel OPEC decided to cut production by a greater-than-expected 1.2 million barrels a day on Friday, and some members indicated it was open to further cuts.
The processes for extracting oil shale are still hugely expensive — which is fortunate, because the potential environmental costs are staggering. You can pump oil from oil shale by heating the underground formations, with untold effect on groundwater. Or you can dig it all up, cart it away and heat it somewhere else, scarring vast tracts of the West.None of this has stopped Congressman Richard Pombo of California — champion of the idea that we can drill our way to energy independence — from throwing yet another economic bone to the energy sector. In a little-noticed provision of the much- reviled Deep Ocean Energy Resources Act — which the House passed in June and the Senate will take up when Congress returns — Mr. Pombo lowered the royalty rate for oil shale from 12.5 percent to 1 percent. Should the day arrive when the price of shale oil becomes competitive, this could turn out to be an extraordinary giveaway of federal revenue (most oil shale lies under federal land) and a huge incentive to wreak environmental damage.
Falling US fuel prices ease fears of recession
Climate Change Is Real, but How Bad It Will Be and How Fast It Will Happen Is Still Open to Debate
It also bears repeating that 50 percent of the contribution a car makes toward global warming occurs during its manufacture and the extraction of its raw materials. Better mileage or a different fuel source isn’t going to change that, nor does ethanol significantly reduce CO2 emissions, and may actually increase a few other pollutants.
Has Diesel Grown on the United States?
Evangelicals Ally With Democrats on Environment: Religious leaders hope the global-warming campaign sends a message to the GOP.
More energy policy gridlock seen in next Congress
If Democrats gain control of one or both houses of the U.S. Congress, they will likely face continued energy policy gridlock, industry lobbyists and congressional experts say.
Prop. 87 fuels high octane fight on oil production tax
Russia Rattles Asia With Attack on Shell's Sakhalin-2
The attack on Shell is more about OAO Gazprom's attempt to get a piece of the project than protecting wildlife, analysts say. The move has angered Asian nations banking on Sakhalin to help meet their growing energy needs. Sakhalin, just 25 miles north of Japan, contains the equivalent of 45 billion barrels of oil, equal to the North Sea's reserves, Shell estimates.
British wildlife head north as planet warms
Indian protests threaten northern Peru oil output
Peru Indians armed with bows, arrows and rifles continued to block oil production at Argentine crude producer Pluspetrol on Thursday as the government warned of fuel shortages in the jungle region.Pluspetrol shut down its 50,000 barrel-per-day oil output in Peru's northern jungle on Tuesday after Achuar Indians took over four oil wells, complaining that crude production is damaging the environment.
Danish PM: EU must become less dependent on imported energy
'Save us from the fires of Shell,' say Irish gas protestors
Mayo, Ireland - For over two weeks the site of a planned gas terminal in north-west Ireland has been the scene of tense early- morning standoffs between police and prayer-chanting protestors.
Skills shortage hits oil sector
A skills shortage is jeopardising the future of the oil and gas industry, according to a new report.
Companies learning how to power down
A Holiday Inn in Sarasota can serve as an inspiration to businesses everywhere trying to cut costs. It recently reduced its energy bill by $3,000 a year by adding a reflective roof.
Water scarcity seen dampening case for biofuel
Water scarcity harms the case for using food crops to make biofuels, a leading environmental author and journalist said on Thursday."The downside of growing food for fuel is water," said Fred Pearce, author of the book "When the Rivers Run Dry".
[Update by Leanan on 10/20/06 at 9:41 AM EDT]
Green chimney could save the planet
A new power plant chimney that converts greenhouse gases into helpful substances could have a huge impact on global warming.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0610/S00240.htm
So, noone can tell you with certainty what the weather will do, or how it will react to some event. Science can only tell you generalities and probablities. It is always like that, but in this case more so. But you ignore what the scientists say at you own peril.
The measured sea level rise is above the predictions of the IPCC models.
I think we are going to have to retreat from the coasts. Something to keep in mind, before spending billions of dollars on new infrastructure (new transmission lines, banks of wind turbines, new rail lines, etc).
Tragedy of the commons.
Maybe as the cities become uninhabitable we could railroad the refugees to the shale deposits - and give each refugee a pup-tent, shovel and maybe a couple bic lighters to heat the shale...
But stories like the ones about the protesters in Ireland and South America make me wonder. The people who are paying the price for environmental destruction are often not the ones benefitting from the resources extracted. Maybe the locals will end up helping avert the Tragedy of the Commons.
Though anything that can be extracted by an individual or small group, such as firewood from a forest, is probably doomed.
While local protests can make a lot of noise, cause a lot of bad publicity, and delay things, in the long run the fundamental principle that 'money talks' usually wins out.
The promulgation and enforcement of environmental regulations on a national scale is a very complex, tedious, and highly political process. The fact the much of the oil shale is on federal lands does not give the locals much clout.
Based on over 30 years in the environmental consulting field, I can say with great confidence that if we start having serious trouble meeting US consumer's demand for fuel, those oil shale projects are going to be completed come hell or high water.
Wouldn't you think the protests might evaporate when it threatens to be permanently dark out, and people get cold and hungry and thirsty?
Protests may last only as long as at least some of the basic needs are still provided for. It's hard to imagine people waving banners on a freezing empty stomach. They'd be much more likely to go scrambling for food and water. And anything that burns to keep them lit and warm.
In that sense the protests can be regarded mainly as a luxury. In a well fed human, reason may be the driver, but in a hungry person, the reptilian prevails.
Though for them climate changes and other kinds of pollution may be tough, "we" will have all that and then some. Though, don't forget, Africa, Asia and South America, where life is most basic, have been our chemical and nuclear waste dumps for decades, and the Peru tribes may find their water starts killing people.
But since you mentioned Ireland as well, I got to thinking what I thought. Bangla Desh and the Niger Delta have seen large protests as well, in various ways. ANd undoubtedly, much more in on the way.
I'm not so sure of your police-work there, Norm. I think the well-fed in our society can show a remarkable amount of social disinterest and a preference towards 'protecting what you've got', while in hard times, I see people (and myself) more inclined to offer and to ask for support. Your example jumped to the extreme of people already desperately starving, of course, but unlike a mass of drowning people who'll be dunking each other to keep air in their lungs, I don't see starving societies operating on that same purely solo death-match.
Bob
"Firness will be the petrochemical capital of the free world!"
Great soundtrack by Mark Knopfler
Bob
-Most people don't have fireplaces these days. Firewood doesn't do you any good if you don't have a place to burn it. Sure, you can always do so outside, but do you want to be the one huddling around a campfire in a New York winter?
-Cities don't have forests (save a few parks and random trees) and that is where most people live. The vast majority of our population is clustered in a few urban centers.
-To get firewood in the city you have to either have it brought to you, or go get it yourself. There might be a few people bringing firewood into sell, but by the time this becomes necessary I suspect that fuel will be lacking as well, so whoever the merchant was would have to find an alternative means (horse and buggy). Otherwise, the city folk would have to go get it themselves. Without gas, they'd have to walk. How far is it to the nearest forest from most of our cities? What are the odds a group of tired, hungry, and cold people could go back and forth enough to cause damage? Or even get there at all, if they were leaving from, say New York City.
It's already happening.
These stories are from last winter. The URLs don't work any more, alas.
And from India:
And over at PeakOil.com, there are people bragging about how they ignore the law and take firewood from national forests near their homes. They argue that this is more "sustainable" than driving to where the law allows them to take wood.
A lot of houses still have fireplaces. And a lot of people are installing wood stoves.
The population is at least three times what it was when we last depended on wood for fuel. And we deforested a lot of land then. Even if only a fraction of us convert to wood, we can do a lot of damage.
In my mind I see this happening the farther north you get as NG prices skyrocket in the future. What do you see as stopping this from happening? For me it's going to happen as each individual is forced to make his/her decision; damned the collective results.
Global warming making it so warm you don't need to heat your house?
You'd still need to cook, of course. A food scientist I spoke with last year said the reason there are so many raw dishes in Japanese cuisine was because of the scarcity of firewood.
"One person stealing wood is pathetic, a million stealing wood is chaos".
I think the movie Dr. Zhavago will have some scenes in common with the future of many countries.
Firewood? Sh|t, people will be burning plastic toys, and everything else for heat. Polution or no polution.
They will also steal everything that is not nailed down.
Maslow's "heirarchy of needs" will be taught in realtime up close and personal to people who never knew what "going without" is/was.
Good story. Some excerpts:
Debt holds U.S. troops back from overseas duty
At the same time (2000-06) wage and salary income has gone from 50% of GDP to 46%.
No wonder even soldiers are not allowed to "flee" from the chains of debt...
Voter Malaise in Michigan
They are especially hard-hit because of the auto industry's troubles.
In particular, those who feel strongly about the labor movement and those who oppose immigration have been left behind by both parties. Immigration may be the issue to run on, for a third party candidate. As long as they weren't a racist nutburger. (See Buchanan, Pat.)
The Gambinos and the Genevieves.
Both are orginized crime families, which one do you want to pay your protection money to?
Try to get a 3rd party on the ballot. BOTH families(I mean parties) have worked VERY well together to kill any new families, I mean ensure that NO new 3rd party candidate will make it on the ballot in enough states to threaten them.
But seriously, debt load is a much bigger problem than ever before.
Household debt service now takes up on average 14% of disposable personal income - the highest since such data has been compiled (1980). It was at 10.75% just 10 years ago...And keep in mind that interest rates were at record lows until very recently.
By comparison, personal fuel expense is still only 4% of disposable income, though up from 2.5% five years ago..
The effects of Peak Debt are being felt right now, it seems.
Interesting numbers.
Do you have links for them?
http://www.economagic.com/
You can produce charts, etc in this site and ...it's free!
2006 01 2265.
2006 02 2132.
2006 03 1972.
2006 04 1832.
2006 05 1953.
2006 06 1833.
2006 07 1772.
2006 08 1665.
Federal Reserve
--Household Debt Service and Financial Obligations Ratios.
The Household debt to GDP you have to construct by dividing the series of Household sector (within the Total Credit Market Debt Owed heading)by GDP in current dollars.
Be sure to turn on Advanced Features so that you can save series onto the personal workspace so that you can manipulate them.
Run a series of houses for sale, divide by population, i.e. get the numbers of houses currently for sale per person and then graph it. The "overhang" of unsold homes has just zoomed in the past few years.
In the past 5 years it has gone from 1.0 house per 1.000 people to 1.90 - and the pace is straight up, almost vertical. In just the last 12 mos. the ratio has gone from 1.45 to 1.90...the housing bubble is far from over.
Fun with statistics...
I should note that most of the job growth we keep hearing about that brought us out of the last market downturn is indirectly or directly in housing construction.
Is this the other half of that grail?.
Or half of that half?! Half that? Lots of fun in any case, and lots of data.
Welcome to the economics of political funding.
Something tells me Hillary will be doing just fine.
Demis vs. Repugs. I mean Stand-for-Nothings vs. Child-Molesters.
Let me give you an example.In Massachusetts we have an Awesomely Rich, Smart, Goodlooking, Black, Democrat Lawyer who made a career freeing Cop-Killers and Denying he gave them money vs. an Awesomely Rich, Goodlooking, White, Republican, Toady-to-the-last- scumwad- who-is- now-running-for-President.
Moral of this lesson. If you want to win an election. If you want to be a politician. It doesn't matter if you are black or white. It doesn't matter if you rape kids in your spare time or if you serve tea to Martha Stewart. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if you are smart or a complete airhead.
The only thing that matters is that you can speak. Being awesomely rich and fairly goodlooking have their benefits. The only real advantage is speaking. You are just a mouthpiece. You are owned. That's why you have the money. Duh.
The American people still don't get this. Duh. But it's another story why. Maybe next time.
Since when did Democrats start standing for protecting your children? Since Mark Foley. That's when. You people vote for these assholes. Time and again. When are you going to grow up?
The only requirement is that you can speak. And the American people will buy every word we give you to say to them.
All men and women of draftable age take note. If they try to get you and you can't get out because of health, Don't ask don't tell (counterfited or not), you can always take out the credit cards and go shopping!
Buy a Hummer (on credit), get out of Iraq free!
And to think that before people had to say they were gay and get a dishonorable discharge.
Scalability is another thing to question — if you have a perfect lab prototype that extracts energy from coal and collects all the byproducts, but it's made of solid platinum, they probably aren't going to build another Sikeston plant to that design.
Seems to me I saw a (guess)timate on an old TOD thread that it would cost 40% of the total energy to collect everything, but that system was based on air (80% N2 + 20% O2) and using conventional scrubbers to clear the CO2 from the flue gas.
Emil Bailey, A Dangerous Mix of Oil and Water (www.financialsense.com)
OPEC Exports to Slide in Month to Nov. 4, Oil Movements Says
And what unlikely heroes. Endy Chavez? Yadier Molina?
And now Jeff Weaver may pitch Game 1 of the World Series. The End Times are upon us, for sure.
I normally think sports is an utter waste of time, but I'd just as soon have the hometeam win for a change. Go Tigers!
Oh and Kjmclark....Detroit kicks our ass at hockey every year so you've got to pick the battles, yeh know?
Did they also tell you that they're filling up the oil wells wih abiotic oil, so we can continue to pay grown men millions of dollars to play a kids' game? ;-)
Don't Let Exxon Decide Our Energy Future
I shared this sentiment with you for all of 5 seconds before I realized that this is the same organization that has declared Fannie Mae's book so clusterfucked, that they can't audit them and yet Wall Street cheers on and the people of this country kept watching Survivor. It will benefit those who are already informed, but not much more.
Maybe you're right though and this is the report where Congress and the people wake up. However, when our own energy dept plays the devils advocate, it makes people wonder who is really right, the accountants or the geologists?
Tuesday, Oct. 17, the Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group steamed into the Persian Gulf to join the US naval, air and marine concentration piling up opposite Iran's shores. It consists of the amphibious transport dock USS Nashville, the guided-missile destroyers USS Cole and USS Bulkeley, the guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea, the attack submarine USS Albuquerque, and the dock landing ship USS Whidbey Island.
The Iwo Jima group is now cruising 60 km from Kuwait off Iran's coast. As DEBKAfile and DEBKA-Net-Weekly reported exclusively two weeks ago, three US naval task forces will be in place opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea by October 21. The other two are the USS Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group and the USS Enterprise Strike Group.
http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=3401
Other than that the Iranians are probably thinking to themselves "Woohoo, that's a lot of money and steal floating around out there. Let the Americans spend all they want." In short they probably aren't too impressed with America's display of sea power.
Has anyone seen Iran mention their presence? They know they are there. They may not care.
And now there is this little coincidental meeting...
Top commander in D.C. for talks amid Iraq concerns
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/20/iraq.main/index.html
If all the above pans out and a new military campaign begins before 11/2 elections, the ever decreasing price of crude now will cause the resulting spike then to be lower than it could have been.
It feels to me like market massaging in anticipation of a spike, but, as I have stated before, I am more paranoid than most.
Go ahead SAT...cut into me.
If take and hold Khuzestan is the objective, then fast landing LCACS are tip of the sword.
Any clues?
Oil tumbles despite OPEC cut
Markets drive down prices - OPEC revenue goes down.
OPEC cuts more output - revenue goes down more.
Markets drive down prices more - OPEC revenue goes down even more.
OPEC throws in the towel and pumps like mad in effort to get revenues up before citizens revolt.
Chavez gets voted out in 7 weeks without oil money to dole out to his electorate.
OPEC floods market with oil - gas goes back down to $1.50 (or less). Consumers rush to car dealers and buy lots of SUVs. GM & Ford are saved - hire back laid off workers.
BTW - in my area of country - N-NE exurb of Atlanta, I am suddenly seeing a LOT of new SUVs with the dealer tags. Even $2.00 gas gets consumer buying again.
To answer your questions:
A. Elections may not mean anything if BIG market movers are playing around - they don't care who is in congress - they can a Demo or Repub any day of the week. Remember that GM is a component of DOW30.
B. Not sure about attack on Iran - if it does happen it will be Israel that does it. Iran's oil may not matter if they cut it off - there is so much out there right now.
they can BUY a Demo or Repub any day of the week.
See? Guess everyone still thinks this was a temporary spike in prices, just like the 70's and early 80's.
I'd like to see the sales report for sept/oct 06 on this next month.
Those who learn from the past, oft' fail to learn from the future.
There was a large spread between spot and longer forwards even a while back, but I don't remember if it was this large.
Thks much
LAst year in june it was around +20 that iis the forward month traded at a $20 premium to Dec 2010. Right now its -9. In August this year the spread was +10.
You will notice the most obvious fact is that the curves all have roughly the same shape. I don't know if it has always been like this or if it is a new phenomenon. The one thing I have observed is that long-term prices seem to lag behind near-term ones. When prices are going up, near prices are higher than the far futures. When prices are falling, near prices are lower than the futures. I think that explains some aspects of the shape.
What I don't understand is why there is this persistant structure of a rise to a peak a year or two in the future, followed by a steady fall. I can't see what market dynamics would produce this as a consistent pattern through all the ups and downs.
Here is the most recent, October 20, 2006:
Here is April 26, 2006:
Here is March 23, 2006:
Imo, overall low stocks, increasing china demand by consumers plus their spr, and reduced opec output will result in sharply higher prices in the near term unless chris' expected new supplies materialize soon.
As I mentioned in my posting just above, it seems to be a general pattern that the distant futures prices move similarly but less than the near-term prices. This makes sense, in a way: whatever information moved the price today, it might have a similar effect on our expectations for long-term prices, but there are a lot of other things that can happen between now and then, so the effect should be less for long-term futures.
When, as today, we are in a falling price pattern, distant futures will be higher than current prices; but when prices are going up as they were a few months ago, long-term futures tend to be lower than short-term. In effect, long-term futures act like a moving average of near-term prices, so that their changes lag behind current prices. I posted some charts above of the price structure that illustrate this phenomenon.
Commodity futures prices are commonly higher than spot the further out you go into the future (contango), in order to account for storage, insurance, etc. For agri commoditites the crop cycle is a factor, too. This should have been the case with oil, as well - but it wasn't (until recently). Futures prices were lower than spot and the vurve was downward sloping, i.e. the further out you wnr the cheaper the prices. This is known as backwardation and is uncommon.
I believe there were two reasons for backwardation:
The market is now in contango, with an unusually wide price spread between spot and 12mos out (almost -$10) - the widest in at least 4 years. This can be interpreted as low oil demand now, but recovery pretty soon.
What do you guys think?
"An action plan to cut Europe's energy consumption by 20% before 2020 has been outlined by the European Commission."
Despite Popular Belief, The World Is Not Running Out Of Oil, Scientist Says
We have enough nuclear fuel to make the time horizon unimportant for discussion.
And theres this technology developed in the 30's and more fine tuned by Sasol that converts syngas (CO + H2) to just about any fuel you want. We usually talk about this with coal liquefaction or gas to liquids plays, where its a proven technology, though capital intensive.
Show up with a little more money for some more nuclear reactors and you can do lime burning of limestone to drive off CO2, and then mix the CO2 with steam and engage in high temperature electrolysis. The output is very high purity CO and H2 on one side, which can be fed into all the old CTL and GTL plants that ran out of coal and natural gas a long time ago.
Eventually the quicklime left over either gets used in cement manufacture or just reverts to limestone as it sucks CO2 out of the atmosphere. Either way its carbon neutral. So, yeah, we'll allways have 'oil' or at liquid hydrocarbon fuels, but they might be hellishly expensive.
When are people going to wise up to this play on words?
I've got an old motor oil container in the garage. It's got a couple of drops at the bottom. If I keep it forever, I'll never "run out of oil". Sheesh.
Say goodbye to the Taurus, Ford's '80s savior
I fell in love with the Taurus the minute I set eyes on it. It was such a revolutionary design, at the time. I didn't care for the re-design they did in the mid-'90s, though. It looked like so many other cars. And there was less interior room.
The aerodynamic Taurus was born partly in response to the energy crisis of the '70s. It died because Ford turned its attentions to trucks and SUVs instead of cars. The Taurus is still Ford's best-selling car, but they're killing it anyway.
I have an older vw & several return lines started leaking at the same time. In replacing them the injector parts place said they are hopping to get replacement pumps ,injectors,etc. as many are failing due to the loss of lubrication in the new diesel. They recommended an additive from now on. Hope it didn't damage the pump.
Complexity #@%$!!!
BTW :Congrats to TOD. I can no longer even scan every thread.
When Canada's Ontario province resolved to close its 5 coal plants a while ago, someone noted it might not have that much effect, since the fumes of 421 US coal plants reach Ontario.