Draft Roscoe Discussion Thread w/ Poll
Posted by Super G on September 28, 2005 - 10:31am
A few posts ago, Dave proposed a presidential run by Roscoe Bartlett in 2008.
By 2008, oil-related issues will be even more on the public's mind than they are now, and people will be desperate for a new perspective. Bartlett would not be towing toeing the Republican party line and would certainly spice up any primary debate. As I said earlier, "There is a precedent of candidates using a presidential primary campaign to give their pet issue air time. If he was in the primary, the MSM would have no choice but to cover peak oil." Peakguy adds, "I think Roscoe could be the Ross Perot of the 2008 Republican Primary Race—injecting an issue that forces others to deal with—something other than the culture wars."
It's three years away, and doing a Google search on draft+president+2008 yields grass roots campaigns for Hillary Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Mark Warner, Russ Feingold, Dennis Kucinich, Mark Sanford, Oprah Winfrey, Wesley Clark, Gavin Newsome, Joe Biden, Blanche Lincoln, Brian Schweitzer, Barack Obama, etc. Looking at these sites might give you an idea of what one of these campaigns is like.
Is this a good idea? Take the poll...
Agreed. He would be a longshot, but there would be press coverage of the issue.
After all, Bartlett will be 82 in 2008, and I think that he oldest candidate on record was Bob Dole, who was 73 in 1996.
If peak oil just got that far--so that anyone who talked about energy policy had to take a position on peak oil and talk about their plan in the context of peak oil--we'd be way ahead of where we are now.
(I don't mean it. Bartlett is much more my type, even if he's a Republican.)
"GRIDLOCK!" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0500148/quotes
You might as well claim that "it's" is possessive now just because everyone uses it that way.
Another good reason for him to run would be that he is a Republican with stellar conservative credentials. He could speak to the right wing of the political spectrum. Center and left types are much more likely to deal with reality free from ideological predispostions. The right wing needs help.
I think Roscoe needs to start running NOW.
A. invading Russia through the new Iranian conquest or
B. blockading the Chinese/Japanese Alliance or
C. Drilling in Antartica
But as far as politicians go, my searches for alternatives to Bartlett came up empty. I find this situation absolutely incredible. There's an article in Esquire (October) called The Five Minute Guide: Oil that discusses PO -- 5 minutes presumably being the attention span of the average Esquire reader. This week's Time Magazine has an essay by Matt Simmons. There was the NY Times Magazine article. There's been lots of exposure lately in the hurricane season. I can't turn on NPR without hearing an energy-related story. They were talking about tar sands just the other day. They had a 3 part series on oil and political trouble in the Niger Delta.
And yet, there is only one person in the Congress discussing peak oil. Here we are, (some of) the people, trying to elevate our leaders to a point where they can see what's going on. Somehow, I don't think democracy was supposed to work this way.
Glad he is taking PO seriously and I welcome his participation. Glad I'm not the only Republican devoting time and attention to the issue.
I could kick Arnold for his lame energy policies here in California - behind the humbug about renewables and conservation is nothing but LNG.
When the Republican Party gets on board, I think you'll have to admit that they are the most capable of actually doing something about it!
If there is a petro-collapse and he is president, perhaps you will be eating homosexuals--like me--to stay alive.
We all want to repeat some event from the past (another Ross Perot, another Marshall Plan, etc.) but in the era of dwindling energy, we will not be able to repeat the past.
As Heinberg said in his closing speech at YSO, our society will change in many unexpected ways as Peak Oil plays out.
As one example, consider the rural working class being hit by higher fuel prices, described in the just-posted article in The Nation: Running on Fumes. A hardcore Republican is already talking government intervention:
To understand the politics of the coming era, we should study periods of massive social change -- not try to re-live the tranquil period of the last few decades.
How do you mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populist
The Professor is going a bit out to lunch the last few years.
I am still surprised that he has been in office this long.
I expect he will be answering for carrying 'The Crown' for Rev. Moon
during his next election cycle. Check it out.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/06/21/moon/