I wish I didn't have to be the wet blanket
Posted by Heading Out on September 24, 2005 - 10:50pm
And for this post I need to recognize David Williams who first pointed this out to us. South Texas and Western Louisiana have an immediate problem, and the rest of us have a relatively intermediate term problem. And it has to do with the immediate availability of gasoline. As Rita came close to shore, gas stations all over the Gulf Coast began to run out of gas. It was not really a long-term worry since the refineries were right there and could resupply. But now they are no longer on-stream. The folks that run them have followed instructions and are gone for about a week . It is going to take some time to do the safety checks and repairs needed to get the facilities back to order, and then gas can, to a limited degree, begin to flow again.
But we have lost the stock reserve that has been eaten up in matching the lost production from Katrina, and so now it will be more difficult to bring up the refineries. Not (and this is the good news) because of the sustained damage, (because the word running around is that this has been much less than anticipated) but because they are going to start running out of crude.
There were significant concerns about being able to repair the Katrina damage, since it was worse than that imposed by Ivan, last year. But to pretend, as some of the MSM are already doing, that we are home free for the rest of the year, is more than irresponsible. The fact that Georgia is closing schools for a couple of days to recognize the short term fuel problem is to minimize the concerns that should be going up as red flags all over the Eastern half of the country.
Right now the production from the Gulf is completely shut down. It is going to be that way for a while, as companies go back and bring the platforms back to life, and test the pipelines that will bring the oil to shore. Even with little damage the experience from Katrina suggests that this is going to take at least a month. In the interim the pipelines supplied by the Texas and Louisiana refineries may begin to see a supply problem. Luckily they are near the major storage of the SPR, though even that has a limit to the amount that can be easily made available. Remember also that we are in a world where the foundation ground is disappearing due to flooding and storm activity. The response of the MSM so far is still a "we dodged a bullet" but unfortunately we haven't taken our shirt off yet.
But then, on the other hand, maybe global warming will make this a really mild winter. If you live in somewhere such as Maine, perhaps you'd better start hoping that that will be the case,
Should be easily resolvable, but we've been living such a hand-to-mouth existence for gas that finding that small amount extra could be difficult without new conservation measures. So, in the short term prices might rise again, and there will be even more pressure from elected officials to haul the big oil guys in front of committees to show how responsive (or not) the administration is. Can the administration talk it out, or might they be forced into doing something? In other words, is the business-as-usual scenario about to change?
a gas leak and a spill
[QUOTE]A key natural gas installation in southern Louisiana known as Henry Hub, through which a third of the nation's natural gas flows and where spot gas prices are determined, was damaged by Rita, Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco said.
"We understand there is a gas leak and ... a possible shearing of an oil storage tank," Blanco told CNN.
She gave no other details about the damage or its effects on gas delivery, but said the leak would have to be plugged.
"We're watching the situation very carefully," Blanco said.[/QUOTE]
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticleSearch.aspx?storyID=66903+25-Sep-2005+RTRS&srch=Henry+H ub
It interconnects with nine interstate and four intrastate pipelines: Acadian, Columbia Gulf, Gulf South Pipeline, Bridgeline, NGPL, Sea Robin, Southern, Texas Gas, Transco, Trunkline, Jefferson Island, and Sabine. The two compressor stations can compress 520,000 decatherm/d (6.3 GW) . The transportation capacity is 1.8 billion ft³/d (590 m³/s)."
Nymex Henry Hub
Henry Hub
and New York City Gate?
And why do they differ so much?
NYMEX HB = $12.32 and Henry Hub is $2 more. NYC Gate is $15.
Could someone explain those numbers?
If not, it's somewhat predictable that they won't.
Saturday shut-in stats:
http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2005/press0924.htm
These evacuations are equivalent to 79.73% of 819 manned platforms and 68.66% of 134 rigs currently operating in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM).
Today's shut-in oil production is 1,500,898 BOPD. This shut-in oil production is equivalent to 100% of the daily oil production in the GOM, which is currently approximately 1.5 million BOPD.
Today's shut-in gas production is 7.488 BCFPD. This shut-in gas production is equivalent to 74.88% of the daily gas production in the GOM, which is currently approximately 10 BCFPD.
The cumulative shut-in oil production for the period 8/26/05-9/24/05 is 31,781,559 bbls, which is equivalent to 5.805 % of the yearly production of oil in the GOM (approximately 547.5 million barrels).
The cumulative shut-in gas production 8/26/05-9/24/05 is 147.991 BCF, which is equivalent to 4.05% of the yearly production of gas in the GOM (approximately 3.65 TCF).
Publicly traded companies are very careful with how they release material information about their operations. The rules, strategy, and tactics of that are very mature. A publicly traded company can't hide materially significant bad news for too terribly long without taking some very significant risks. But timing the release is a tactically complex mess; particularly because being totally transparent can get you into trouble because it's likely to lead to a very inconsistent message stream. The market really really doesn't reward an inconsistent message coming out of a company.
http://www.worldenergysource.com/wemr/letterB_0905.cfm
However, this piece you posted seems optimistic and fails to mention that SA recently admitted that they will be unable to keep up with demand in 10 - 15 years.
So who knows?
Go to http://www.globalpublicmedia.com/transcripts/212 and check the last question and answer. The interviewer asked Simmons what Bush wants the American public to know about peak oil, and he says Bush told him "Matt, you continue to speak out, loudly and honestly, about how serious our energy problems are. You have no axe to grind and it really helps."
To me, this sounds like Bush and his advisors are well aware of the proximity of peak oil. (I'm amazed by how often the question is discussed about whether Bush or some large corporation or another "knows about peak oil". I think those entities would have to be phenomenally stupid not to know, and we should assume that they do know until we're presented with very strong evidence to the contrary.)
I suppose the cynics could say that Bush doesn't believe in peak oil, but he knows that having people like Simmons talking about it justifies higher prices which helps Bush's oil industry friends. Even as cynical as I get with American politics I'm not ready to make that assumption without solid evidence.
(And yes, I'm intentionally ignoring the possibility that Simmons is simply lying about what Bush has said to him.)
september 2000, cheney's PNAC complains the oil wars will be slow to get started without a "new pearl harbor" to rally support.
may 2001, cheney calls for 1300 to 1900 new electric plants, most probably nukes
june 2001, cheney's National Energy Policy Development (NEPD) Group emphasizes nuclear and hydrogen
september 11, 2001
September 2002, peak oil is probably the primary cause of the wars. PNAC's september 2000 document "rebuilding america's defenses", laid it out pretty clearly, and government policy seems to be following it pretty closely, which shouldnt surprise anyone, since this document was adopted as the official bunnypants administration's "National Security Strategy in september 2002, in some places, verbatim.
PNAC's plan seems to be: grab all the oil possible to (1) hinder china's development into a military rival to the usa, and (2) grab all the oil possible to sell at the highest possible prices to finance the transition to a hydrogen economy.
at 10 billion bucks a clatter, how much are 1900 new nuke plants gonna cost?
Just imagine what investing that money into wind/solar/wave/geothermal would do... What a waste.
HUX5 is off significantly - 1.89 down from 1.99 close Friday. A big %-wise move. Apparently someone believes they not only dodged a bullet but missed skinning their knees too.
Given the imperfect information available and low volume, I won't be too surprised to see prices all over the map today... these are the early indications only.
Crude Futures Fall in Rare Sunday Trading
have there been any real numbers yet? Or is this the markets sigh of relief that it missed houston?
Just goes to show how unpredictable the markets are.
But hey atleast its cheaper :)
In an earlier thread I asked whether refiners had to buy (at least some of) their crude through NYMEX contracts. I didn't hear from anyone on this - maybe a stupid question - but if so it could explain a bit. Downward pressure on price due to missing buyers as refiners aren't buying (first because they were too busy evacuating Houston, now because more refineries are offline).
In a somewhat similar manner, the mess that is causing gas stations to be out of fuel in TX could show up as a demand drop for fuels in the short term if deliveries aren't timely.
I, too, hate the constant spin in this country that talks about bullets being dodged just because we averted armagedeon.
To not demand this full disclosure is to be as complicit as Humvee drivers in failing to prepare for the crisis to come -
Daneshy's argument relies on drawing an analogy between the Saudi situation on the one hand, and Prudhoe Bay/Texas on the other. But IF the analogy indeed holds, this means that by the time the Saudis get to 3:1, they too will be in a status of decline roughly mirroring where Prudhoe is now relative to the 10mb/d they produce now. And once they get to 12:1, Saudi production will be a relatively insignificant trickle relative to what it is now - just like in Texas. Given that the Saudi water cut is inexorably moving from its present 60% or so to the 75% prevailing at Prudhoe Bay, Daneshy's data and analogy prove that the day is not far off where Saudi will have reached a point in its production history analogous to that of Prudhoe at present - i.e., in manifest decline.
This raises a key question: Does the analogy between the three cases above permit one to draw a general conclusion about a correlation between a specific water-cut ratio and the exact timing of production peak in that province? Perhaps study of the historic data coming from Texas and Prudhoe will reveal this magic number to be somewhere in the range of 60% and 75% water cut? If so, and if the general analogy that Daneshy is appealing to in his faulty argument holds, then maybe this can be the basis for predicting Saudi peaking, based on projecting current growth trends in ITS water-cut percentage.
http://www.state.ak.us/local/akpages/ADMIN/ogc/annual/2003/prudhoe-oil.pdf
It looks like for Prudhoe bay (scroll down quite a bit), rollover occurred when the water cut went through 50%, in 1992. No idea if this is readily generalized or not, as it certainly depends upon well type (vertical vs. horizontal vs. MRC), etc. However, the 50% number for the field "feels" intuitively correct, FWIW...
But where can I find out about natural gas? I, like many other, see the looming disaster that is the supply shortage of natural gas and am much more concerned about it rather than gasoline supply.
So, any idea where I find out where our NG comes from?
To put that in context with the current GOM outages, EnCana's total output is about 3/8'ths of the total 7.5BCF shut out at present.
NG is in short supply. Big on-land producers can not makeup for significant shortfalls from GOM production (whether the shortfall is a result of off-shore issues or from damaged on-shore processing facilities).
My impression is that pipeline network for gas is sufficiently interconnected and redundant that at this point we are all in the same market for gas. If New England needs it and is willing to pay more than Minnesota then prices will rise in Minnesota. I.e. that supply will move pretty quickly toward were ever the demand has the most willingness to pay.
Is this correct?
For oil it seems less clear, to me.
Here's a map I found
http://www.greatlakesgas.com/pipeline/pipe_map.htm
that is at least one company's map of canada/ minnesota/ wisc/ michigan nat-gas-pipeline. One of the offshoots is near me in rural duluth, mn. I assume the country is spider-webbed with pipelines like these. But whether we get canadian nat-gas or not in Minnesota, its all market priced, so I assume it will all go up at nearly same price, whereever you are.. or .. ?
PhilRelig: nice come-back comments on the UofHouston guy's critique of Simmons.
Knowledge/Etc. of Bush/Cheney: I'd rather not think about these two guys, but its hard not too, with their names pushed onto you day after day, and them being at the helm of U.S. ... I have no doubt that they (well, cheney) forsaw oil/gas/energy trouble coming, as he is on record of saying, and thus the iraq war,etc. as an attempted strategy to grab?stabilize???/get .. some oil. But whether these guys really know whats going on, or have a handle on things, i just really tend to doubt. (war doesnt seem to be going so well,etc) We all are often governed by rose-colored glasses / blinders / biases we have, and I am sure they are no differant. - Lorax73
your statement that you'd "rather not think about these two guys" disqualifies you from any serious discussion of how we got into the pickle we're in.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/12733615.htm
The gasoline outlook could get worse after damage assessments at large refineries in nearby Beaumont, Texas, and Lake Charles, La., which suffered the strongest winds and worst flooding.
In a statement Saturday afternoon, Royal Dutch Shell said that its Motiva refinery in Port Arthur, with a capacity of 285,000 barrels a day, sustained damage to a cooling tower.
Valero Energy Corp. said that its Port Arthur refinery, with a capacity of 255,000 barrels a day, sustained "significant damage to two cooling towers and a flare stack." The company anticipated that "it will take two weeks to a month to implement the necessary repairs and restart the refinery."
ExxonMobil didn't provide damage assessments for its massive Beaumont refinery, which has a capacity of 348,000 barrels a day. Citgo and ConocoPhillips didn't immediately discuss damage to their Lake Charles refineries, which have capacities of 324,000 and 239,000 barrels a day, respectively. The French company Total didn't report on damage to its 233,000-barrel-a-day refinery in Port Arthur.
http://www.southeasttexaslive.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15275455&BRD=2287&PAG=461&dept_id =512588&rfi=6
At the ExxonMobil Corp. Beaumont refinery, spokeswoman Kathleen Jackson said by cell phone that the refinery is beginning to call selective crews who are key to restarting the refinery when electric power finally becomes available.
From a potential damage standpoint, Jackson said, "It didn't look too bad."
She said flaring looks "pretty good," and that's a result of some product level remaining in the towers. That is there to help the refinery units return to service when power returns, but there is no prediction when that might occur."
What the Saudis face is not catastrophic decline--unless every reserve estimate going back to the Exxon/Mobil/Chevron/Texaco days was inaccurate--but the transformation of their industry to one that must drill and manage a significantly larger number of smaller (but still very large) fields. That's where their unexploited reserves are. I think you can raise legitimate concerns about their ability to do that without financial and technical assistance from outside the country, without disputing the reserves themselves.
In other words, the question we should be asking is not whether they have the oil they claim to have, but whether they have the plans and means of exploiting it when the need arises.
see the table here to see the mysterious overnight doubling of OPEC reserves in the late 80s. and then try to convince me that anyone in their right mind should pay attention to anybody's reserve figures.
The big "aha" about the Kingdom is not that the oil is about to run out. It's that we can't rely on them for more than very modest increases, and they've said as much. Peak or no peak, that suggests that supply won't be able to keep pace with demand within a decade.
"Gasoline is flowing back into the Houston area and its main evacution routes just in time for the mass migration home.
"Drivers scouting for gasoline today are reporting success after a little persistence, while service stations, convenience stores and even grocery stores are assuring customers gasoline should arrive anytime."
"Hoping to get a jumpstart on the traffic expected to resume in earnest today, state troopers escorted tanker trunks full of gasoline to stations on Saturday and companies rushed to deliver extra fuel to gasoline-hungry areas overnight."
"The north Houston and Pasadena terminals that supply Shell stations were open again today with enough gasoline to fill up at least 30 tankers with 270,000 gallons of fuel. The tanker drivers have instructions to start with gas-needy I-45, I-10 and Highway 290.
"Exxon Mobil was bringing in tanker trucks from as far away at New Jersey and Illinois. Company officials said they delivered 531,000 gallons of gasoline to 14 retail stores in the Houston area on Saturday, the equivalent of the normal daily demand for the entire Houston market."
It sounds like the Houston metropolitan area is not facing a particularly bad gasoline situation, although the need to suddenly transport half the city's population hundreds of miles would of course strain any infrastructure. But if even Houston is OK, it doesn't sound like other areas of the country should have much to worry about.
The fact that gasoline futures prices are down again today suggests that market traders don't foresee any major supply crunch over the next few weeks and months. It will be interesting to see if TOD readers have a better crystal ball. If you guys keep beating the markets maybe you ought to try your luck, it's not everywhere that you can get rich just by being right.
We have really no data other than a few phone calls from a few oil workers who "don't see much damage". This is all short term stuff. Short selling gasoline futures will not create increased supply.
And the only people who I know who would short sell gasoline futures on a Sunday, after a huricain, with little to know information, have very very very deep pockets otherwise they would never take such a risk.
This market behavior is risky. If the news turns around, a refinery blows up being restarted, or the damage is far worse than what is reported and known, then prices could turn around fast. And when that happens, these people who sold short will have to cover their looses by buying back contracts, which is bullish for the price of gasoline.
This appears very political to me, and is a ploy to give people a false sense of security regarding their "sugar", which is gasoline.
Suppose that this were happening, that some deep-pocketed groups were selling into the market to drive gas and oil prices down, even though everyone knew that in a week or a month the truth would come out, the shortages would no longer be able to be covered up, and prices would skyrocket. What would happen then?
I'll tell you - everybody and his brother would be in the market, buying. That's what happens when you give money away. People take all you have to give.
Nobody is deep-pocketed enough to move markets in this way, against what everyone (supposedly) knows is the truth. The problem (from "their" perspective) is that anyone in the world can buy these under-priced contracts being pushed for sale, in the expectation of making a sure-fire profit once the shortages appear. And that's not just private individuals, that's every other company in the world which can put its wealth into that market.
Nobody is richer than the whole rest of the world put together. If "they" were really trying to move the market in a way that everyone knew didn't make sense, it wouldn't work, because too many people would show up to take the money that the manipulators are giving away.
Besides, what would be the point? So "they" drive gas prices down today. But if there's a shortage, there's a shortage! No market manipulations are going to change that. The shortage will show up anyway, probably within a few days, if the infrastructure damage is as bad as the reports here indicate. Why would anyone give away enormous sums just to produce a few days of fake good news? Reality is going to catch up to them soon enough.
Honestly, this kind of conspiracy-oriented thinking is not a good way to analyze the situation. There is no evil "they" out there that is trying to manipulate the markets, and even if there were, they certainly aren't doing a very good job of it.
A more likely explanation IMO is that we are getting selective news here. We are hearing only the most negative reports, the refineries in trouble, the rigs that are failing. It's a highly biased presentation. And so this is giving readers here a false impression of how bad the situation is. The markets see it differently; they think that Rita will turn out to have had little effect, and Katrina's cleanup will continue. It's not an unreasonable view! So prices have come down once again to pre-Katrina levels.
No conspiracies necessary; all that is required is the ability to say, maybe I'm wrong, maybe all those people who disagree with me might be right.
but manipulation cant happen in an energy market, since we're dealing with real substances and shortages thereof?
ever heard of a little houston company called enron, headed by bunnypants' buddy, kennyboy lay?
Conspiracy abounds over the dreaded yellow metal... its all completely pointless even if true. Who cares if Gold is manipulated, I care if WHEAT, MILK, EGGS, MEAT (well, soy, I am a vegetarian) etc are available, not gold which few of the worlds population have in amounts large enough to make it a currency again.
Selling short a few energy futures for a loss wouldn't even put the smallest dent in the ESF balance sheet.
They own the printing press, and as such, do not need to worry about certain things like margins requirements or losses.
Anyways, the constant reinforcement and playout of comments regarding not as bad damage (which mostly refer to the Texas City refineries and not to east texas west LA refineries) are very, very premature given how little information is available to energy consumers. There literally isn't enough information to make confident major decisions on energy plays.
Not to mention, we have no idea what happened to the offshore rigs, and how long energy will be shut in from the GOM. This is most definitly a sucker move in the markets.
Chevron
Chevron is assessing offshore oil and natural gas production facilities as weather permits. Initial assessments have revealed that the Typhoon tension leg platform (located in 2,000 feet of water in the Green Canyon area approximately 165 miles south-southwest of New Orleans) was severed from its mooring and suffered severe damage during the storm. The facility has been located and is being secured. Chevron has mobilized appropriate resources to address any environmental concerns. No employees are at risk. Prior to the storm, the company safely evacuated employees and contractors from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico facilities. Decisions on when production can be restarted from the company's other offshore facilities will be made when the post-storm assessments are concluded.
Reports of a gas leak in the proximity of the Henry Hub facility located in southwestern Louisiana were investigated by emergency response personnel. Two separate natural gas releases were located and secured, neither of which was sourced from Chevron's Sabine Pipe Line Company or Henry Hub.
The company also advises that its Houston offices will be closed on Monday, Sept. 26, but will re-open on Tuesday, Sept. 27. However, the company is advising employees who left Houston during the evacuation to follow plans laid out by public officials regarding their attempted return to the city.
[Note: I live in Houston, the Mayor updated his plan and told people that those who work in business that are important to the city's infrastructure should return ASAP. I think this is important.]
Rowan Companies
Rowan Companies reports that, in the aftermath of Hurricane Rita, its jackup rigs Rowan Odessa and Rowan Halifax were not at their pre-storm locations. In addition, the hull of the jackup Rowan Louisiana apparently detached from its legs and is aground offshore Louisiana. The Company was also unable to account for one rig, the Rowan Fort Worth, via a high-altitude aerial survey conducted yesterday.
The Rowan Odessa, Rowan Halifax and Rowan Louisiana were operating under contracts that provided for total revenues of approximately $210,000 per day. The rigs are collectively insured for an amount that exceeds their aggregate carrying value. The Company does not maintain insurance against loss of revenue.
GlobalSantaFe
GlobalSantaFe reported that two of its jackup rigs, the GSF Adriatic VII and GSF High Island III, could not be found on their drilling locations during a search by fixed-wing aircraft Sunday. There were no signs of any major damage from Hurricane Rita to the company's other rigs in the Gulf of Mexico.
GlobalSantaFe's fleet in the Gulf of Mexico includes nine jackup rigs, four semisubmersible rigs and one ultra-deepwater drillship, the GSF C.R. Luigs. The drillship relocated before the area was impacted by Hurricane Rita, and all other rigs were safely evacuated in advance of the storm.
The rigs contributed $5.3 million of the company's total $135.3 million of net income for the first six months of 2005.
Transocean Inc
The Deepwater Nautilus, an ultra-deep water state of the art semi-submersible drilling rig, owned by Transocean Inc., broke free while attempting to run from Hurricane Rita and is now adrift in heavy Hurricane Rita seas. According to Transocean spokesman, Guy Cantwell, of the forty-five crewman that were aboard the rig, the final fourteen were safely evacuated late this afternoon. Prior to Hurricane Rita's entrance into the Gulf of Mexico, the rig was undergoing repairs to its mooring system miles south of Cameron, Louisiana. The rig was under tow to "safer" waters heading east when the rig towing bridle broke in heavy Hurricane Rita winds and seas. Transocean is able to monitor the rigs position by using onboard transponders, but will not likely be able to reattach tugs until Rita moves ashore.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=1160341
The government has already agreed to loan or sell 24.2 million barrels of reserve oil to refining companies after Hurricane Katrina.
The Department of Energy said one of the stockpile's four storage sites suffered minor damage and was affected by flooding, and another site was also impacted by flooding after Rita.
A department spokesman on Monday did not know if the damage and flooding would affect oil shipments from the reserve to refineries.
Bush said a significant amount of shut oil refining capacity in Texas and Louisiana will be back on line soon, but urged American motorists to conserve gasoline where possible.