Would I were a gambling man
Posted by Heading Out on August 22, 2005 - 9:18pm
Well it is hard to admit, having spent the last 3 hours playing Blackjack for play money (it is one of the amusements at our Conference) that I am not normally a gambler. But I am caught by the challenge in John Tierney's column in today's NYT. And was very tempted to e-mail and see if I could have a piece of Matt's side of the action.
Mr. Simmons said he favored a simpler wager, based on his expectation that the price of oil, now about $65 per barrel, would more than triple during the next five years. He said he'd bet that the price in 2010, when adjusted for inflation so it's stated in 2005 dollars, would be at least $200 per barrel.
Remembering a tip from Julian, I suggested that we use the average price for the whole year of 2010 instead of the price on any particular date - that way, neither of us would be vulnerable to a sudden short-term swing as the market reacted to some unexpected news. Mr. Simmons agreed, and we sealed the deal by e-mail.
In reality, however, I find the rewards that come from answering technical challenges give a much greater return. In which regard, the Conference I am at does not normally deal with energy related issues in much detail. But this year, for the first time in several years, the Chinese delegation was strong and openly technical. And two of the more interesting papers, which few of the delegates caught, show that the Chinese have been following Western technology in close detail, and have been willing to put those ideas to the test in some of their wells and laboratories. Their advances are now to the point that they are certainly at least on par with some of the more advanced techniques that are still being evaluated here in the US. We posted the other day about the geater number of engineers being graduated in China than here, and the message I received today is that they have filtered Western technology and are now pushing the envelope faster and with more support than those of us who initially conceived the ideas can find here in the US.
Technorati Tags: peak oil
An issue I note with the terms of this particular bet is that the terms are much worse than just buying 2010 oil futures (currently trading at $59.24 as I write this. If I buy a barrel of oil for $60 now, and in 2010 its worth $200, I can sell it for that and I make better than triple my money. On the other hand, if I'm wrong and oil tanks to $30, I only lost half my money. OTOH, if I bet with John Tierney, my best upside is to only double my money, and my downside is I lose it altogether.
No doubt Matt Simmons is rich and $5k is pocket money, so he's happy to do it just for the publicity (hell, he'll probably make the $5k back in extra book sales in a week or two), but to me the bet looks like a lousy deal.
Stuart.
Stuart.
If Simmons really believes what he says, why is he offering even odds when he can get long odds in his favor by buying oil options? You can buy a December 2010 $100 option for $2.80 today, which will be worth $100 if oil hits $200 as Simmons expects. That's like 35 to 1 in his favor.
I guess he's just not very sophisticated financially (no criticism intended, he's an expert on oil, not commodities trading). Someone should clue him in that he's giving money away.
Stuart.
Well, it's interesting that he doesn't mind looking like a financial jackass for all the world to see, taking a bet when he could get thirty times better odds elsewhere. The article made it sound like it never occured to the guy that he could make money betting on his beliefs. Some financial whiz.
I guess it's like they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity. Just spell the name right, that's all that matters.
Stuart.
BTW, on CSPAN today, the pro-ethanol farmers are getting hammmered by the EROI scientists. What is the bet that political parties buy farmer votes anyway? The markets are always wise and all knowing.
My opinion is that the peak oil case appears to be very compelling, and that as more and more people get past their prejudices and take a hard look at the evidence, they will be convinced of it too, and the price of oil will go up and up. It's only just starting to get mainstream exposure now, Once people believe that oil is going to be more and more scarce in the future, they will want to buy it now.
Stuart.
PO is hitting new highs on Blog Pulse:
http://www.blogpulse.com/trend?query1=peak+oil&label1=&query2=&label2=&query3=&l abel3=&days=180&x=34&y=7
http://www.adamsmith.org/logicalfallacies/000609.php
Crumenam, Argumentum Ad
The argementum ad crumenam assumes that money is a measure of rightness, and that those with money are more likely to be correct. 'If you're so right, why ain't you rich?' is the common form, but it translates poetically as the belief that `truth is booty'.
*--------------
As an aside, you can bet for lower oil prices.
Are the economists betting for lower prices?
Tierney's bet with Mr. Simmons is all very amusing, but one thing I found not so funny. I expressed it this way in an e-mail to Mr. Tierney:
This seems to put a pretty large qualification on Tierney's definition of the word sustainable. From an ethical standpoint, I find this very troubling.
If you ask the President of one particular country, I hear he is willing to make the "ultimate sacrifice" for freedom to Propel his SUV proudly about the ranch.
If you ask one empty-wombed mother sitting in a ditch by the side of his ranch, she has a different understanding of "Price".
We make a lot of PP noise: "price", "pay", "P...ppproud to be an American". But what does it mean?
...
Government controlled markets are not sure things. There are precedents for not getting paid off.
Also, I've invested about 1/3 of my 401k in the energy sector and that's enough exposure for me.
Even after the Freakonomics guy, it just amazes me how economists are all-purpose sources nowadays. I think the Delphi oracle or looking at birds' entrails was more scientific.
Mike Cain
"They" who are in power and are wise and all seeing bring you the following new gifts:
1) Patent DEFORM: (Lord, make the one hand like the other! --a prayer by a guy with a twisted, deformed right hand):
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/05/08/22/2143226.shtml?tid=155&tid=103
and...
2) New Rules: All trucks are equal, but some are more equal than others:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/AUTOS/08/23/fuel_economy/index.html
http://swiftreport.blogs.com/news/2005/08/poll_most_blame.html#more
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_08/006970.php