More "peak oil navel gazing..." (or, let's just publicly ignore the lessons of the last few months)
Posted by Prof. Goose on December 5, 2005 - 12:49am
Hold on to your gas guzzlers: Cheap oil may once again be just around the corner. Even as consumers worry about high gasoline prices and rising heating bills, oil executives in London, Texas and Saudi Arabia seem to be concerned about a prospect of falling oil prices.http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/2005/12/04/business/outoil.php. Discuss.
That's another 45,000 bpd to be found from expansion elsewhere.
They probably see that "good ole" cunsuming keeping the money in their pockets for a month or 12.
Looking at some of the economic data it's tough for me to disagree with them.
"Sorry sir, you problem doesn't fit our templates"
But TJ, the point he was making was precisely the opposite, that the oil business is a long term business. By its very nature, every decision they make has to look ahead decades. An oil company which only cared about the short term would not invest in oil development and would not be in business.
This being my first post, i'd like to express gratitude admiration to those individuals - the community - doing an serious effort to raise the debate on oil and gas production.
Well, there is an explanation that i've would like to have comments on. The exec are mostly sanguine, which they wouldn't be if they "knew" about any kind of shortages, bad news et cetera the next couple of months. That is, bad news on the western hemisphere.
Clearly, one could argue that demand destruction at prices in the range of 50-80 $/B would "free" a lot of oil resources for the benefit of those who can afford it. That could explain their attitude. Perhaps the obligatory optimism among execs, combined with some distorted pragmatic view on handling the coming challenges (relying on demand to materialize solutions), could serve to be some sort of an explanation.
From my superficios knowledge, there has been reports on problems relating petroleum supply in africa and countryside china, which i suspect could persist and evolve without major persistent attention in europe and us.
Beeing a person who know very little about the oil business, my questions is: The oil bourses are in NY and London, soon also in Teheran. How much of the oil&gas produced worldwide are made availeble on the bourses? Are there some global trade regulations making all oil flow trough a bourse? Are there a lot of oil beeing traded in national unilateral argreements?
My point: an effective global marked on oil will mitigate effects of depletion for a period. In the meantime, those who are wealthy and informed will enter a potential time of crisis financally well prepared.
Greetings from Norway.
I think that the Dollar Crunsch that is coming will be so fun as the Fall of the Roman Empire...
I will buy gold...
If the US dollar plummets, as the great conveyor belt carrying wealth to the US from Asia (primarily) breaks down, oil (and LNG) producers are likely to choose to sell their product in euros. That would signal the beginning of serious price increases for US consumers. An apparent surplus as a consequence of sharply reduced demand freeing up some spare capacity would be unlikely to last for that long, given how close we are now to peak production. Once oil prices (denominated in euros) started to increase again, American consumers paying for oil with dollars falling in value at the same time would really be caught between a rock and a hard place. I suspect the US would decide not to take it lying down and would embark on another foolish military adventure, thereby making everything worse.
In deflation, cash is king. You want to hold the safest, interest-bearing cash investments. That means insured bank accounts and U.S. government bonds. Yes, the U.S. government is a safe investment. Any scenario where that comes into question is one where slavering mutant hordes are coming to eat your brains, so you'll have worse things to worry about than a bank or bond default.
"Yes, the U.S. government is a safe investment. Any scenario where that comes into question is one where slavering mutant hordes are coming to eat your brains, so you'll have worse things to worry about than a bank or bond default."
US treasure bonds will be not a safe investment if China drop all its US Treasure bonds and if the countires that have petrodollars don't have power to buy these US TB. By the way, next year we problably will see an inverted yeld curve for the US Treasure Bonds, be warned that it is not a good thing.
The thing is that we will not see dollar deflation. The federal governemnt will continue to have a huge deficit while there are the tax cuts, so if no one buy US Treasure Bonds they will need print money. The consequence is that we can have a recession with inflation, not the better of worlds. while that, GM and Ford aren't at good health now and who know how recession and inflation will affect other US big companies. That can be disastrous to US economy (think Katrina hiting US economy ...)
Hmmmmm.... "slavering mutant hordes" coming to eat our brains can be better than what we will see when the Dollar Crunsh come.
I would say that short term treasuries should be safe for the forseeable future, but I certainly wouldn't bet on an insured bank account. IMO there's too high a risk of a run on the banking system during the kind of financial crisis I envisage, and insurance wouldn't be worth the paper it was written on under those circumstances. Remember what happened to bank accounts in Argentina during their financial meltdown?
The only reason I can think of for buying precious metals now would be as a hedge against that sort of collapse (in which case I'd choose silver, not gold), but that raises many other issues. What do you do with it? How do you trade it in if you need to at a later date (especially if you live in a rural area and are fuel constrained)? Would there be a confiscation order (as there was during the Great Depression)? If so that makes the first two questions even more pertinent.
Personally, I don't think there's much point for ordinary people (myself included) in owning precious metals. The money I could afford to spend has been sunk into a small farm with solar panels, generators and deep-cycle batteries instead (even though I expect the price of all those things to fall in the future - I had a learning curve to deal with and that takes time).
After all, you can't eat gold, and if you live on a farm you can't easily use it for anything you might need. I reckon providing for the necessities of your own existence at a practical level is a far better hedge against social upheaval caused by deflation than metals would be. As far as I'm concerned, a strategy of combining provision for the basic necessities with holding adequate liquidity makes the most sense.
Debt, by the way, is a no-no. Inflation eats away at savings and debts, but deflation increases both as the real rate of interest (the nominal rate minus a negative inflation rate) is potentially quite high even if the nominal rate is low. Today's low nominal interest rates are a trap.
I see "management blindness" all around me on an everey day basis.
lose their jobs if they spoke the factual
truth.
so which will it be, the end of dollar hegemony via housng bubble or peak oil?
In my opinion it is almost criminal the way our policy makers in the U.S. are allowing the average consumer to think supply AND prices are going be in their favor. As I have said before at this site. You can tell people that energy is going to get scarce and expensive and they will grumble but make changes to their habits.
If how ever you let them (or activly encourage?) that supply will be very robust, in fact so robust that prices are going to come way down than people will change behaivor in that direction. Which is where we are now in early December with everyone assuming the worst is behind us. Most people I talk to are not aware what problems we will face if we have 3 months of sustained cold weather. We will consume a lot more gasoiline, heating oil and NG than we have over the past 3 months.
The heating bills are just starting to come in and they are 2x to 3x what they were last year BEFORE it got cold. We are subzero now and expected to be there for weeks. Bad things are about to happen.
Much of this inflation data will not be reported publicly for months - I only know because of family links in the business...
Toll Brothers has recently announced a notable slowdown in sales, implying that at least the US market is pretty much sated, overstretched or both. Edmonton builders compete continent wide for materials and Canada suplies the US with much of it construction material. The indicator link is incontrovertible.
Is it completely clear that a housing price/currency collapse lead to a significant collapse in oil prices? While it is a sure thing that discretionary energy usage will decrease as the economy slows it is not completely evident that this will lower prices to their 90s levels. As any Kunstlerite will tell you, demand destruction potential will be tempered by the housing boom driven expansion of the average urban "wasteline".
Also, "past performance does not necessarily indicate future performance." The "post oil shock" price drops were definitely related to massive demand destruction but this combined with significant growth in daily production. A scenario combining demand destruction with only marginal and short lived production increases, or declining production, is completely unprecendented (correct me if I'm wrong on this one). China and India seem content to grow consumption of oil at todays prices - will 20% more expensive prices make a big difference? Is it not possible that demand destruction in the West (US) will be rather quickly offset by demand growth in Asia. Would this not play perfectly for the Chinese national strategy of securing a bigger piece of the world's resource pie?
At the current time, even in a severe recession or depression, we are still structurally dependent on the car and semi-truck for our way of life so even if the government has to declare martial law and take control of various industries in order to ensure movement and distribution of basic goods and services (to avoid riots and total meltdown), we'll still continue consuming a large percentage of oil relative to what we consume today. It would take a near total US social collapse to eliminate the US as an oil consumer and I don't think that's likely to occur, at least yet.
Unlike tulips, houses have real intrinsic value. While some localized areas may see price corrections, on the whole people buy houses to live in them, and if their prices stop going up, they'll do just that. They'll hold onto them and live in them, and find some other way to make a quick buck than flipping houses.