Iraq cuts fuel subsidies
Posted by Yankee on December 29, 2005 - 11:34am
So how much were Iraqis paying, and how much will they have to pay now?
Over the summer, gas was selling for about 5 cents a gallon. Now it's about 65 cents, and at the end of the price increases, gasoline will cost about the same in Iraq as it does in other countries in the Persian Gulf, about $1 per gallon. The prices of kerosene, diesel and cooking gas have seen similar or steeper increases. Diesel costs about 38 cents per gallon.Though that may seem cheap to Americans, wages in Iraq are far below those in the United States. Employees in government ministries, for example, earn about $130 a month on average, putting them among the top earners in Iraq. Millions of other Iraqis live in poverty, relying on food handouts from the government. About a fourth of all Iraqi households subsist on less than $1 a day.
"Twenty dinars a liter is basically free," he said. "The only thing you're spending is your time waiting in line. The people who have automobiles presumably have more disposable income. Poor people are not necessarily using cars."
This seems a little disingenuous, since the removal of the subsidy affects all fuels, including those for heating and cooking. Furthermore, as one Iraqi at the end of the article notes, the biggest problem is that an increase in fuel prices will cause the price of all types of goods to rise.
And what has the Iraqi reaction been? Well, protests, anger, limited violence, for now. Obviously Iraq is in a tenuous social and economic situation for many reasons right now, and isn't exactly an appropriate model for how countries deal with very high priced energy supplies. Still, it might be worth it for Western countries to keep an eye on this situation to see what the long-term reaction of the Iraqi people to the oil price hikes is.
Quote:
America's capital is not in Washington DC. In fact, it is not geographic location at all. It is the greenback, the epicenter of the global rule. The dollar is the cornerstone upon which the mighty pillars of empire rest.
At the same time, the greenback is the greatest swindle in human history; a worthless scrap of paper buried beneath a mountain of debt.
.
.
.
At present, the greenback serves as the world's reserve currency, the main medium of exchange. This allows the US to pile up enormous debt while avoiding the pitfalls of skyrocketing interest rates or hyper-inflation. The $2 billion of borrowed wealth that props up the faltering empire every day comes primarily from the exporting powerhouses Japan and China.
.
.
The empire requires a steady diet of petrodollars to maintain its gluttonous appetite for debt. If the oil-producing nations switch to euros, the dollar would freefall like a wingless gull and America would be trapped in a bottomless vat of red ink.
America's prodigious debt has made the war for the world's remaining resources an existential struggle. A retreat from Iraq is no longer possible. If America's debt is not propped up with oil reserves the anemic dollar will crumble with the economy following right behind.
"No one can now doubt the word of America," George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 20, 2004.
empirenotes.com
The simpler solution, which would solve the problem, is to stop trading in US $ and trade only in the local currency.
Yes, the above is right but then that's why the US invaded, to keep the world from trading oil in anything but $'s.
See -Israel to bomb Iran before the Oil Bourse opens March 2006.
Remember when we were told, as if by magic, that foreign investment and oil revenues would pay for the reconstruction of Iraq? But of course Iraq's oil production declines this year Is now the time to mention Iraqis shutter largest oil refinery after threats of attack? OK, time to use the rant tag.
<rant>
If people are smuggling the refined products out of the country, that means that these products are controlled by the black market, not somebody who could use the money to rebuild iinfrastructure. How immoral is it that the US and the UK, having created this mess to begin with, based on non-existent weapons of mass destruction, and who largely control the IMF, are now asking Iraqis to make sacrifices when these same Iraqis are totally fucked already. And now that LA Times link has gone stale and they want me to register to read it. So, I'll use the Washington Post instead. At Gas Stations in Iraq, Price Hike Fuels Outrage. And No kidding. Words do not begin to convey my feelings of outrage upon hearing this story.
</rant>
Isn't there enough misery and despair in that hell hole without adding yet another reason for the Iraqi people to be even more pissed at the US and the new Iraqi government than they already are?
While there may be a sound economic rationale for the removal of the fuel subsidies, the timing of such a move couldn't have been worse. What are these people thinking!
Iraqis are also plagued by shortages, because the subsidized fuel is smuggled elsewhere for profit. It's also over-used. Just cutting those two things will eliminate the smuggling and make supplies far more reliable, eliminating a huge tax on people's time.
Did you ever think that it might be better to just give people money instead of subsidizing fuel? And what's this "brand new set of targets"? Fuel tankers have already been used as bombs, so I can't see what you're talking about.
RE: "[terrorists are] probably the ones getting most of the money from smuggling the subsidized fuel out of the country"
Proof? I think it's ordinary corruption by people who are in a position to siphon off and sell that imported refined product trying to make a buck off an unstable situation. This is usually called profiteering in a chaotic situation. See Russia circa the early/mid 90's.
RE: "And what's this 'brand new set of targets'"?
I don't recall attacks on gas stations being a trend here. Nor on refineries. Pipelines, yes. These other targets, no.
The tankers are good targets (and have been used as rolling bombs when loaded with explosives), the stations aren't particularly.
But my larger points, made earlier in my first comment in this thread, should not get lost in these details. And if you want to say I suggest that you make your policy recommendations to Nancy P. Jacklin, the US representative to the IMF, not me.
Yes, I think giving people money via tax relief, tax credits or a 'basic income' is the way to go. Same for Venezuela etc. Same for other subsidized goods like food. For more info, just google 'basic income'. Poverty, energy, the environment - they're all linked...
Yeah, it will. Big deal. People keep saying this in the United States too, usually as an excuse to avoid fully charging suburbanites for the destructive choices they make. It's bogus here, and it's probably bogus there:
if a loaf of bread (here) costs $2, and gas doubles in price, the suburban apologists (here) make claims that loaves of bread will double in price. Which, of course, is baloney. 10-20% rise in cost? Sure. But the cost of all fuel inputs at all stages of production of any product doesn't remotely approach even half of its retail price.
So, yeah, the cost of goods will rise. If gas in Iraq doubles, maybe the cost of bread will go up 15%. That's minor, even there.
"Millions of other Iraqis live in poverty, relying on food handouts from the government. About a fourth of all Iraqi households subsist on less than $1 a day."
Eat this; less than $1 a day and bread is going up 15%.......
We've spent so much killing and destroying so much - why is NOW the time to optimize the return on distributing oil products?
Our behavior in Iraq is a stunning combination of malevolence and incompetence. Can't we show even a bit of compassion? Is profit all that matters?
However, to say the least, the timing is completely assinine. Weeks after the election, no new puppet government in place (what does it matter if it is Iran's puppet), no credible authority outside of the green zone, etc. etc. This move will only further the downward spiralling situation in Iraq.
Sometimes I wonder just how stupid and arrogant the people making these decisions are. Then they prove themsleves to be more stupid and more arrogant than I could have imagined.
=AC
IMF approves $685 million Iraq loan
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last Update: 3:01 PM ET Dec. 23, 2005 http://tinyurl.com/b3uf8
=
=
=
=
=
=
=<<Snips From the Prologue of EHM>>
"That is what we EHMs do best: we build a global empire. We are an elite group of men and women who utilize international financial organizations to foment conditions that make other nations subservient to the corporatocracy running our biggest corporations, our government, and our banks. Like our counterparts in the Mafia, EHMs provide favors. These take the form of loans to develop infrastructure--electric generating plants, highways, ports, airports, or industrial parks. A condition of such loans is that engineering and construction companies from our own country must build all these projects. In essence, most of the money never leaves the United States; it is simply transferred from banking offices in Washington to engineering offices in New York, Houston, or San Francisco.
Despite the fact that the money is returned almost immediately to corporations that are members of the corporatocracy (the creditor), the recipient country is required to pay it all back, principal plus interest. If an EHM is completely successful, the loans are so large that the debtor is forced to default on its payments after a few years. When this happens, then like the Mafia we demand our pound of flesh. This often includes one or more of the following: control over United Nations votes, the installation of military bases, or access to precious resources such as oil or the Panama Canal. Of course, the debtor still owes us the money--and another country is added to our global empire."
Outside the window of my Outback, great clouds of mist rolled in from the forests and up the Pastaza's canyons. Sweat soaked my shirt, and my stomach began to churn, but not just from the intense tropical heat and the serpentine twists in the road. Knowing the part I had played in destroying this beautiful country was once again taking its toll. Because of my fellow EHMs and me, Ecuador is in far worse shape today than she was before we introduced her to the miracles of modern economics, banking, and engineering. Since 1970, during this period known euphemistically as the Oil Boom, the official poverty level grew from 50 to 70 percent, under- or unemployment increased from 15 to 70 percent, and public debt increased from $240 million to $16 billion. Meanwhile, the share of national resources allocated to the poorest segments of the population declined from 20 to 6 percent.
Unfortunately, Ecuador is not the exception. Nearly every country we EHMs have brought under the global empire's umbrella has suffered a similar fate. Third world debt has grown to more than $2.5 trillion, and the cost of servicing it--over $375 billion per year as of 2004--is more than all third world spending on health and education, and twenty times what developing countries receive annually in foreign aid. Over half the people in the world survive on less than two dollars per day, which is roughly the same amount they received in the early 1970s. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent of third world households accounts for 70 to 90 percent of all private financial wealth and real estate ownership in their country; the actual percentage depends on the specific country.
Ecuador is typical of countries around the world that EHMs have brought into the economic-political fold. For every $100 of crude taken out of the Ecuadorian rain forests, the oil companies receive $75. Of the remaining $25, three-quarters must go to paying off the foreign debt. Most of the remainder covers military and other government expenses--which leaves about $2.50 for health, education, and programs aimed at helping the poor. Thus, out of every $100 worth of oil torn from the Amazon, less than $3 goes to the people who need the money most, those whose lives have been so adversely impacted by the dams, the drilling, and the pipelines, and who are dying from lack of edible food and potable water.
The subtlety of this modern empire building puts the Roman centurions, the Spanish conquistadors, and the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century European colonial powers to shame. We EHMs are crafty; we learned from history. Today we do not carry swords. We do not wear armor or clothes that set us apart. In countries like Ecuador, Nigeria, and Indonesia, we dress like local schoolteachers and shop owners. In Washington and Paris, we look like government bureaucrats and bankers. We appear humble, normal. We visit project sites and stroll through impoverished villages. We profess altruism, talk with local papers about the wonderful humanitarian things we are doing. We cover the conference tables of government committees with our spreadsheets and financial projections, and we lecture at the Harvard Business School about the miracles of macroeconomics. We are on the record, in the open. Or so we portray ourselves and so are we accepted. It is how the system works. We seldom resort to anything illegal because the system itself is built on subterfuge, and the system is by definition legitimate.
However--and this is a very large caveat--if we fail, an even more sinister breed steps in, ones we EHMs refer to as the jackals, men who trace their heritage directly to those earlier empires. The jackals are always there, lurking in the shadows. When they emerge, heads of state are overthrown or die in violent "accidents." And if by chance the jackals fail, as they failed in Afghanistan and Iraq, then the old models resurface. When the jackals fail, young Americans are sent in to kill and to die."
http://tinyurl.com/a3l5s
If you have seen the movie Syriana, the politician's speech about "corruption" strikes a strong correlation to the premise of EHM. We make laws to protect the corruption. The "laws" allow the corporatocracy to continually perpetuate and strengthen itself. "Corruption is why we win"...
==AC
"In their drive to advance the global empire, corporations, banks, and governments (collectively the corporatocracy) use their financial and political muscle to ensure that our schools, businesses, and media support both the fallacious concept and its corollary....One of the corporatocracy's most important functions is to perpetuate and continually expand and strengthen the system. The lives of those who "make it," and their accoutrements--their mansions, yachts, and private jets--are presented as models to inspire us all to consume, consume, consume. Every opportunity is taken to convince us that purchasing things is our civic duty, that pillaging the earth is good for the economy and therefore serves our highter interests."
It was just another political gift from the americans to the resistanse and the sadrists.
==AC
Chalabi takes over Iraq oil ministry amid 'crisis'
Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:46 PM GMT
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Chalabi has assumed direct control of the powerful oil ministry as crude exports ground to a halt due to sabotage attacks and logistics problems, officials said on Friday.
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyid=2005-12-30T124558Z_01_KR A045572_RTRUKOC_0_UK-ENERGY-IRAQ.xml
BTW the reason for raising petrol prices-
High Payments to Halliburton for Fuel in Iraq
by Don Van Natta Jr
The United States government is paying the Halliburton Company an average of $2.64 a gallon to import gasoline and other fuel to Iraq from Kuwait, more than twice what others are paying to truck in Kuwaiti fuel, government documents show.
The US can no longer afford this.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1210-07.htm
And of course, there is nothing to prevent TPTB from doing to the American people what they have done to the rest of the world, should the opportunity arrise.
No doubt there Twilight!! This country is being dismantled and shipped away piece by piece. When the debt bubble goes and the global economy deflates the US will amount to nothing more than one of the third world countries that it helped to create. Except the US will have little of its own energy resources to build upon. Just another cheap labor pool for TPTB to exploit...
==AC